5.62.160.71

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic Golden Age. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

I have once again reverted your edits; you added some citations, but much of your editing was still uncited, and some of it seemed far too broad to be supportable with citations. There were also some copyediting issues. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ibn Muqla, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

You are definitely joking, I have mentioned at least 25 sources on this page for the content, unsourced content, in general, I have done minor content such as mentioning a person's ethnic origin from his own page, as Arab ethnic origin has been mentioned many times. 5.62.160.71 (talk) 01:50, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to Ibn Muqala did not cite any sources. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

When the Arab ethnic origin has been mentioned many times, is there a problem to mention the ethnic origin of other prominent people?! 5.62.160.71 (talk) 01:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

And which copying?! 5.62.160.71 (talk) 01:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ziryab. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

The saffrons were not among the trades mentioned for Arabs in the sources and something called "Islamic garden" is strongly contradicted with architectural and scientific sources and materials, the word Molana is a word of Persian origin that has the root of an Arabic verb Maulavi with the suffix "a" "In itself, it is a complete representative of non-Arabic original, Hazar-i-Shab is a story with Persian origin in Persian language, which has been transferred to Arabic with Arabic additions. Refer to the sources of Hazar-i-Shab, Ibn Muqla's other text was only the required content of the page. which was probably already deleted under the title of vandalism, the importance of the above article and the "Persian Farabi" section is merely to mention its origin, as Arabic origins have been mentioned thousands of times on this page, what is the problem with mentioning the origin of Persian or other prominent people?! Regarding the first article, "They have learned from the Iranians, you should refer to the sources of Islamic agricultural and irrigation technology and the history of sugar." 5.62.160.71 (talk) 02:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

None of that is to do with your edit to Ziryab, which was unsourced.

The problem with your edit to Islamic Golden Age was, as I said, that many of the additions were not supported by sources. Where there were sources, those sources often did not support what you had written. For example, you added With what they learned from the Iranians after The Arabs of Al-Andalus exerted a large impact on Spanish agriculture, including the restoration of Roman-era aqueducts and irrigation channels and then added the source about the cultivation of sugar, which mentions absolutely nothing about aqueducts or irrigation channels. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

The sources of sugar cultivation refer to the cultivation of sugar in India, then Iran, the conquest of Iran by the Arabs and the learning of these techniques and their later transfer to Europe. About "Zirab" the information was from an authentic source that was described much more widely and the conclusion Underwater as Farsi was mentioned many times on the main page itself, it was only added as a general summary at the end. The sources include the material mentioned in it, I will definitely mention more clear sources and books for your said material 5.62.160.71 (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but what you wrote wasn't about sugar cultivation. That's exactly the problem. I'm sure it's a great source about sugar cultivation but it was completely disconnected from the edit you made. AntiDionysius (talk) 03:29, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---