50.102.202.16

I don’t care, bozo

June 2022

Hello, I'm Tristario. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Deputy, Indiana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Tristario (talk) 03:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deputy, Indiana, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Austin, Indiana, you may be blocked from editing. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

It’s not disruptive, I was adding very factual information 50.102.202.16 (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry daddy~ nyaaa~ pwease don’t ban me! Idk how to use Wikipedia UwU nyaaaaa~

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deputy, Indiana. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok I’m sorry~ 50.102.202.16 (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 09:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.102.202.16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn’t do anything wrong. All I did was add updated information about a shop on the Deputy, Indiana Wikipedia page. The shop is literally closed. A simple google search proves it. But I do not know how to cite sources on Wikipedia because I am noob. Plz unblock me. 50.102.202.16 (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Then I suggest that you learn how to cite sources before you request to be unblocked-though sourcing is not the only issue here. If you have a source for this nonsense edit I would love to see it. When you are ready to take this project seriously, let us know. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---