50.206.149.166

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

15:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Blocked again for 1 year

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: ONE YEAR??!! ONE REAL YEAR??!! First, are you aware that this is a school IP address, and that no one has appeared to make any disruptive edits since the previous block expired. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: Please also provide some revision diffs to show which edits since the previous block expired have been disruptive. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:DUCK Block evasion and WP:NOTHERE; but you already knew that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: How am I not here to build an encyclopedia? 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

C'mon, really?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.206.149.166 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocking so soon after a previous block with no disruptive edits in sight may be a violation of the blocking policy. If it is, this should be removed ASAP. If by some chance it is not, please provide detailed explanations

Decline reason:

Apart from the already stated block evasion, if you are unable to see the disruptive nature of your edits posted after the conclusion of the previous block then clearly this is not the place for you to be. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Anthony Bradbury: I have made the following edits since the previous block expired: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The only one I could see to even be mildly disruptive is number 5, but even so, it's not that bad. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

That really makes my case, does it not? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury: The only edit in question is number 5, and that's not even complete vandalism. How does that one make me not here to build an encyclopedia? All the others have been constructive. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: Why did you remove my question from your talk page? It was a good-faith request for explanation. 50.206.149.166 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Armadillo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sutter's Mill— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sutter's Mill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist 12:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Help:Authority control, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

---