51.6.138.13

January 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 09:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.6.138.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not evading anything. I am editing to improve Wikipedia. If you block me and allow (Redacted) to persistently fuck up an English language resource, then you are not here to build an encyclopaedia. 51.6.138.13 (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Decline abusive request and remove TPA. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vandalism

Why has User:Manticore restored poor quality text ranging from merely ungrammatical to actually nonsensical to a series of articles? Why are they encouraging User:Alexander Davronov, who barely speaks English and adds simple garbage to article after article? Is it because they lack the competence to write in correct English, or even understand correct English when they see it? Is it because they are deliberately vandalising? Or is it because the actual quality of articles is of absolutely no concern to them whatsoever? 51.6.138.13 (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:BANREVERT applies. — Manticore 09:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. No Wikipedia policy or guideline mandates or even encourages the addition of grammar errors to articles. You've added nonsensical, policy-violating text to articles; this is what vandals do. You should go back and undo your vandalism, but instead it seems likely that those articles will remain in a poor state, and you will feel smugly satisfied that you vandalised them. You utterly disgust me. 51.6.138.13 (talk) 09:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Even if you hadn't continually evaded your ban, BKFIP, you would have still been blocked for harassment of Alexander Davronov who AFAIK has never made a grammar error in his entire Wikicareer. 🐔dat (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

---