Hi IP 51. I noticed that you removed text with a "citation needed" tag here with the edit summary "There are no sources to back up this point." But that tag was added only four days ago and I found three online sources very quickly. There are even a few YouTube videos that show very clearly how many people turned out for Reg Kray's funeral. It's usually wise to leave requests for citations for at least a month or two, unless the claim is controversial in some way or looks very unlikely. I wonder do you ever actually look for sources, or at least check how long something has been tagged, or do you just remove anything that you see with a tag? Thanks for listening. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I was told in the past that unsourced material is to be removed. A lot of these tags go back years, so if there are any sources for the points in question, would they not have been found by now? The fact that there haven't yet been any added would suggest that none exist.51.7.250.59 (talk) 14:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, contentious unsourced material certainly should be removed promptly. But when an established editor has just taken the trouble to add tags, that suggests they think it's worth keeping. You also removed this claim, with the same edit summary. Yes, that had been tagged since January 2020. But it took me less than two minutes to find multiple supporting sources. I know you are trying to do the right thing and I have not checked all your other deletions. I'm just suggesting that you could have a quick look for sources first. Where you say "There are no sources to back up this point" it might be more useful f you could say "I can't find any sources to back up this point"? Thanks. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'll try and do that from now on then.51.7.250.59 (talk) 01:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, contentious unsourced material certainly should be removed promptly. But when an established editor has just taken the trouble to add tags, that suggests they think it's worth keeping. You also removed this claim, with the same edit summary. Yes, that had been tagged since January 2020. But it took me less than two minutes to find multiple supporting sources. I know you are trying to do the right thing and I have not checked all your other deletions. I'm just suggesting that you could have a quick look for sources first. Where you say "There are no sources to back up this point" it might be more useful f you could say "I can't find any sources to back up this point"? Thanks. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I was told in the past that unsourced material is to be removed. A lot of these tags go back years, so if there are any sources for the points in question, would they not have been found by now? The fact that there haven't yet been any added would suggest that none exist.51.7.250.59 (talk) 14:31, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |