Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (51.9.187.2) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 12:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wimbledon, London without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The content removed was clearly promotional and unverifiable, only being mentioned on the company's website/advertising outside of here. The edit summary was adequate. 51.9.187.2 (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bristol City F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Including a significant milestone event in the lead of the article is clearly not "unconstructive" (or vandalism). Revert by all means and open a discussion regarding the content if necessary, but please refrain from labelling contributions that you disagree with in this way. 51.9.187.2 (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolls of Monmouth Golf Club (July 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 51.9.187.2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply