55eo55

Welcome!

Hello, 55eo55, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 03:53, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello colleague

I noticed by doing a diff over the course of your extensive, and generally helpful of the BLP actor article edits at Taylor Russell, that the entire first paragraph is unsourced. It might be that you untended later appearing citations to cover this paragraph, but not having the relevant citations within the paragraph (near to the sentences covered) is confusing to readers (who understand that the reliability of the content is based on its being sourced from references), and, as well, makes it difficult for any incoming editors to verify new content. For these reasons, content that is not "sky is blue" common knowledge that is unsourced violates WP:VERIFY, and will be considered suspect until it is sourced.

So, if you can return there and tell us, where did that paragraph (with all its stated facts) come from, it would be a help in moving the artcle toward encyclopedic, and it would allow removal of unsightly template messages (tags) about this issue.

Note, also, be very careful to hone closely to the source text. Earlier editing citing TheGrio.com stated the actor was born in Vancouver, but neither her full name, or date of birth, or place of birth actually appear in that article. (It is a great source, just not for those facts.) As well, Russell is not even mentioned in a book that was cited earlier (that is mostly in fact about scholarly aspects of stage productions, e.g., Shakespeare). So we should only place citations that actually cover the content, and then edit the content to match the citations. Cheers. (a former teacher, unfortunately). 2601:246:C700:558:2882:A59A:8DC5:CD1D (talk) 07:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Citation Barnstar
		for your recent substantial work in moving an unsourced section toward highest quality, at an actor's page. Kudos. 2601:246:C700:558:4934:BD1D:2B41:D139 (talk) 20:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sarah Chalke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at David Eigenberg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. This is the edit referenced. While "mixed" is sourced, "mixed to positive" is not. Writing "critical acclaim" also notes a higher level of praise than the source verifies. Rather than just delete these notices, please consider them. KyleJoan^talk 23:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)