Speedy deletion nomination of BOSS ME-5

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on BOSS ME-5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of BOSS ME-5 and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J-p-fm (talk) 22:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page LMS Stanier Class 8F 8233 has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZFUn8x7iXw&NR=1. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Neutons (Phil Ryman and MAN). Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

hey buddy!, can you add the sources of the information you added in the boss article? Tuner420 (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Neutons (Phil Ryman and MAN), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission The Neutons (Phil Ryman and MAN)

edit
 

Hello 59bassman. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Neutons (Phil Ryman and MAN).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Neutons (Phil Ryman and MAN)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Synthi Hi Fli used live on stage in 1974.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Synthi Hi Fli used live on stage in 1974.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Stesmo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sharp Corporation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please read wp:minor as you recently marked as edit as minor that was not..Slatersteven (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Edward Colston, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is the legal case and regardless of any views should be allowed to be stated. It is not disruptive to state the legal facts. Failure to include such information amounts to censorship and will be publicised as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59bassman (talkcontribs)

What you are doing is edit warring to restore your preferred disputed version based on your own POV. If youR second sentence is meant as a threat I'd strongly suggest you don't make it again. Threats of off-wiki action to try to draw attention to your "cause" are not acceptable and demonstrate a battleground approach that falls afoul of Wikipedia policy. Take your concerns to the article talk page, but don't attempt to restore the content again unless you have consensus to do so.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply