Never do this again

edit

dif. If you do that again I will see you indefinitely blocked. Jytdog (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why the disruptive edits? User Tconn has added to the article and left a comment on the Talk page. You either add to the article in a constructive way, or argue against that User on the Talk page. Anything else is disruptive.

You are an employee of MDPI and should not be editing directly at all, much less editing while logged out, much less edit warring. Stop. Immediately. Jytdog (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Your edits on the MDPI page are 100% negative - you clearly have an undeclared COI... no objective arguments. Who are you working for?
I don't work in the publishing industry at all and my work in Wikipedia is based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and it is under those policies and guidelines that you will end up indefinitely blocked if you continue editing while logged out, editing warring, and violating the BLP policy. I will not be replying here further. Jytdog (talk) 17:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
A ridiculous response. You are consistently making negative edits to a website of an OA publisher, and tell me you have no ulterior motives?
  • You are continuing to violate the terms of use and the PAID policy by making undisclosed paid edits. You are continuing to violate the SOCK policy by editing while logged out. Jytdog (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Your recent edits to MDPI could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.