67.177.110.156

Copwatch changes

I've reverted the page to the way other editors have written the page and the way the page has been kept for quite a long time. You seem to feel the Wikipedia page is inaccurate. Other editors have reversed the changes when similiar changes have been made to the page. Keeping the page as it has been for quite some time has not been my agenda. My agenda is ensuring Wikipedia pages have accurate and well sourced information on it. If you feel that your changes are accurate or well sourced, please justify the changes on the Copwatch discussion page so that all editors of the Copwatch page realize that you are not vandelising the Wikipedia page. DivaNtrainin 07:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

No DivaNtrainin, your agenda is ensuring that the page stay as YOU want it, full of misinformation and blatant untruths with no regard to facts or truths. 66.21.132.110 (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Copwatch appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Shanata (talk) 18:39, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Copwatch. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Shanata (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Admrboltz (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

---