67.85.219.228

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.85.219.228 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The administrator is right that I have messing up wikipedia articles on purpose and I acknowledge that I have been purposely messing up wikipedia articles and promise I wont do mess up any wikipedia articles on purpose ever again. I do disagree with the adminstrator about the type of article I messed up that I was edit blocked for messing up. Again I do not think the adminstrator that ip blocked me from editing is wrong but I think that adminstrator is wrong for ip blocking me for messing up and blanking my own ip profile talk page. Again the adminstrator is write I possibly should receive a block but I do not think it should until August because I did not do much and the biggest article mess up I did was my own ip address talk page. If I can't have my ip address editing block removed could I at least have it shorted to a month, maybe a week or day. Thanks, 67.85.219.228. P.S The account name of the adminstrator that ip address edit blocked me is Materialscientist. 67.85.219.228 (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC) 67.85.219.228

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 00:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Materialscientist: I agree that I should be banned because I did vandalize pages but I do not agree with you about banning me messing up and blanking my own talk page. I would be fine with my ip address edit block being removed or shortened to a week , 1 1 month, a day or longer. P.S I promise I won't intentionally mess up any articles ever again after this ip address edit block is removed or shortened. P.S. Is my ability to create accounts permantely disabled even after the ip address block ends or temporalily disabled until the ip address block ends67.85.219.228 (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)67.85.219.228

==

Notice

Just so you know, removing notices is considered proof you have read the notice. Randompointofview (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---