 | Attention:
This . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
Also see 208.77.91.8. -- azumanga 01:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. -- azumanga 13:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If you have a legitimate reason for removing that content, please use an edit summary and discuss it on the talk page. If you are Kenneth Copeland himself or someone from his ministry and would like to contact someone by email to discuss the issue, please see Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject). Thank you. --B 14:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Defamation
editPlease refrain from posting any further defamation concerning the ministry of Kenneth Copeland. Thank you.
- Any chance you would be willing to explain what in there isn't true? --B 15:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The references cited are based in the personal opinions of others and are not based in fact. They are saying they're interpretation of the Bible is better than his which is nothing more than personal opinion.
Since Wikipedia cannot establish personal opinion as being fact, they need to refrain from publishing defamation concerning the ministry of Kenneth Copeland. We've been through this over and over again.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.149.76.114 (talk • contribs) .
- If you want to talk about it, please use the discussion page for the Kenneth Copeland article. You do not just remove the material without saying anything first. I have also added a "disputed" tag to the article, saying that it may not be accurate. And one other thing -- make sure you sign your comments with the four "~"s -- don't just comment without identifying yourself. -- azumanga 02:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland, you will be blocked from editing. -Chunky Rice 02:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland, you will be blocked from editing. -- azumanga 20:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
-Chunky Rice 01:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Who represents wikipedia.org, legally??? That info will be needed soon if you continue to defame this minister.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.149.76.114 (talk • contribs) .
October 2007
edit Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. NHRHS2010 Talk 20:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland, you will be blocked from editing. NHRHS2010 Talk 20:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Kenneth Copeland, you will be blocked from editing. NHRHS2010 Talk 20:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Who represents wikipedia.org, legally??? That info will be needed soon if you continue to defame this minister. You are now allowing un-proven rumors to be posted which will become a major legal problem for wikipedia.org if they are not removed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.149.76.114 (talk • contribs) .
I want you to listen to me and listen good, 69.149.76.114 -- I want you to commit WP:COI to memory, all the way down to the last period. We have standards in which all articles must be neutral, whether the subject does good things or bad things. And of course, EVERYTHING must have sources. The material that you deleted has been properly sourced and documented. Cease and desist on this charade immediately, or may find yourself blocked, permanently. Capische? (PS -- You are also to sign everything you say with the four tildes -- don't expect us to sign your comments for you, or expect them to remain unsigned.) -- azumanga 23:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |