November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. I noticed that you recently removed references from Muhammad and the Bible without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tornado chaser (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yeps, that was a blunder. I was trying to do something but then realized it didn't work. Thanks.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Al-Samawal al-Maghribi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Ahmad Kanik (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ahmad, the only one engaging in disruptive editing is yourself. I've provided both edit summaries and a long explanation in the Talk Page for the edit you're referring to -- you've repeatedly tried to insert unreliable sources into the pages I've been working on, such as the Muhammad and the Bible page, despite the consensus of the editors.
Update: Hopefully, for the reviewers of this page to see the absurdity of this new user trying to list me for 'disruptive editing' despite the fact that 1) absolutely no one disagreed with my edits on the Paraclete page that I'm being accused of disruptive editing on, and 2) the fact that no one, including Ahmad myself, even reverted the edit -- Ahmad has just, as the edit history of this page clearly shows, edited out the page he's accusing me of disruptive editing on. Ahmad has a history of trying to insert unreliable Muslim apologetics books into the Muhammad and the Bible page and, given the fact that I've consistently reverted these attempts with the consensus of editors on my side, I assume Ahmad to have a prejudice against me -- hence, this accusation of disruptive editing.70.49.181.61 (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Update: Ahmad Kanik has now removed the "this user can contribute with an intermediate level of English" template, and replaced it with a "this user is retired from editing Wikipedia template". Alephb (talk) 18:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.