71.174.129.190

April 2020

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse‎ that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Book of Daniel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you know of another Greek king that conquered Persia then let me know and I will stop with that addition.71.174.129.190 (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Book of Daniel. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If you know of another Greek king that conquered Persia then let me know and I will stop with that addition.71.174.129.190 (talk) 01:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:71.174.129.190 reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: ). Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

I keep asking if there is more than 1 Greek king that conquered Persia and upon his death his kingdom was split into 4 smaller and less powerful kingdoms!

So far no one has an answer! Would you like to take a shot at an answer? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!71.174.129.190 (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Win98fan (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Win98fan (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I keep asking if there is more than 1 Greek king that conquered Persia and upon his death his kingdom was split into 4 smaller and less powerful kingdoms! So far no one has an answer! Would you like to take a shot at an answer? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!71.174.129.190 (talk) 02:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Book of Daniel. Win98fan (talk) 02:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If someone can find another Greek king that conquered Persia - then I will stop stating that the Greek king that conqured Persia was Alexander! If you can't answer then it is YOU who has a problem!71.174.129.190 (talk) 02:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

WOOOO HOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now banned for saying that the Greek king that conquered Persia was Alexander!!!

A new low for wikipedia!

Don't worry this was expected upon the first reversion and I still think of you guys as pissants!! to be clear you were pissants before and you are still pissants now. There has been no change in my opinion!

For obvious reasons I bet none of the other reverters were banned! This is typical pissant behavior!

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Well if you can find another Greek King that conquered Persia you will be deserving of a dunce cap! Never mind you probably deserve one already and THAT is TRUE and VERIFIABLE! To NOT be a dunce you and the rest of the wikipedia stooges need to find another Greek king that conquered Persia! I pity everyone you know! They must go through Hell dealing with you!71.174.129.190 (talk) 03:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

and since you can post here, then you were not banned! see! Typical pissant behavior!

Everyone has to obey the same rules. You didn't, so you were blocked. Wikipedia uses "verification" in another meaning than you do. If you still want to edit Wikipedia, you will have to learn our meaning and abide by it. Otherwise you will get blocked again and again. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

• You were not blocked for saying that the Greek king that conquered Persia was Alexander. You were blocked for making more than three reverts to a single page within a 24-hour period. You were the only editor to violate that rule; accordingly, you were the only editor blocked.

When your block expires, I strongly suggest that you do not attempt to re-add the material to the article. Instead, engage in discussion with the other editors on the talk page and reach consensus about whether the material should go in and what reliable sources support it—not just the factual accuracy but its relevance to the article in question. —C.Fred (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Book of Daniel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Epinoia (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

- no one is contesting that Alexander was a Greek King (actually Macedonian) who conquered Persia – the original research is identifying the kings of Media, Persia and Greece as the ones mentioned in Daniel – to add this to the article you need a reference to a reliable secondary source - cheers - Epinoia (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---