71.219.141.37

This is a IP user it could be shared.

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok 71.219.141.37 (talk) 22:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

This is unfair 71.219.141.37 (talk) 01:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

I should not be blocked for editing talk pages. So you don’t understand what block users is for. 71.219.141.37 (talk) 01:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.219.141.37 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was unfairly blocked for editing talk pages 71.219.141.37 (talk) 01:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your block seems perfectly fair given your recent edit history. You were leaving unreferenced changes to articles (1), and discussions that were not legitimate at all (1), and I'll echo Ian.thomson's comment below... you'll be welcome to make constructive edits once your block expires. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's real simple: if you weren't a troll, you shouldn't have acted like one. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Lier!!!!!!!!!! This is bull crap 71.219.141.37 (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.219.141.37 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

you are unfair. I was not acting like a troll

Decline reason:

The majority of your edits were disruptive or simply not constructive. Once the block expires, you are welcome to make useful contributions to Wikipedia, but you haven't given any convincing reason why the block should be lifted early. clpo13_(talk) 17:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Sandbox have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

But it was a test edit. 71.219.141.37 (talk) 00:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

That doesn't excuse adding potentially defamatory or libelous material. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

What does that mean? 71.219.141.37 (talk) 17:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

We do not allow unsourced negative material about living persons (or even persons who might not be dead yet) on any page. "But it was a test edit" does not invalidate that rule nor excuse breaking it. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

It was an Animated character. 71.219.141.37 (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Sandbox

It's the sandbox. It gets cleaned like every five minutes. It's literally impossible to edit war in the sandbox because NOTHING STAYS IN THE SANDBOX. IT'S MADE OF SAND. IT GOES AWAY. Stop being stupid. --Tarage (talk) 01:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Another block

You're just wasting everyone's time. Blocked for a week now. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

---