72.198.182.107

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (72.198.182.107) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

Reference Errors on 27 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Renato Beluche page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 72.198.182.107. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Thegooduser Let's Chat 23:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 72.198.182.107. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Thegooduser Let's Chat 23:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 72.198.182.107. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Thegooduser Let's Chat 23:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

April 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (Help!) 23:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.198.182.107 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me? “my little brother did it”? I am not “evading” my sons block. Thank you for the links, I read them. 1) What my son did was out of frustration over how he was being treated and he apologized for it. 2) It’s not enough for you to bully a dying child whose family is falling apart and deny him the only thing he wants in this world, but you also have to go after his mother? You people are a completely new breed of sick. 3) I am only here for answers and I have no intention of getting involved with editing or “vandalizing” articles, so no, blocking me is not necessary to “prevent damage to Wikipedia.” Why don’t you just be honest about why you are doing this to my family? You are trying to cover up your appalling treatment of my son by silencing his mother. 72.198.182.107 (talk) 00:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you have no intention of editing, you don't need to be unblocked. Please see this page about how Wikipedia is not for therapeutic purposes, and even if it were, there was clearly vandalism. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 00:29, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Please read Wikipedia:Advice for parents. He was blocked because some of his edits were vandalism. That is all. If he can't deal with it, then Wikipedia is not for him; we cannot let him cause problems for us no matter how extenuating the circumstances.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

• I would add that a child dying, however tragic, is not a reason to hand out administrator powers. Administrators are nominated and go through a community vetting process. The community will never give those powers to someone who has only vandalized articles and has not shown an understanding of Wikipedia policies. 331dot (talk) 00:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
• Beyond that, madam, let's get a grip here and inject some common sense into this sordid episode. Presuming this isn't some fairy tale altogether -- the "oh, we need to give the dying child his heart's desire" being a well-known Internet trope -- how was Brendan treated? He wanted to become an admin, and was told that was not going to happen. (In like fashion, he wasn't going to be put in the starting lineup of the Boston Bruins, made an officer in the US Army, become a line firefighter, or any other position requiring years of long hard work, dedication and skill, just because he might want it.) He then started to vandalize Wikipedia, was told to stop, and was ultimately blocked for it. If you consider that "bullying" and "appalling treatment," whatever, but we're not going to suspend our standards any more than the Bruins, the military or the fire department will. Your son was treated, throughout, with civility; we just didn't -- however much American culture is buying into the premise these days -- equate "rudeness" with "not giving you what you want."

  But ultimately, this is what don't I find easy to credit: your son, madam, has been a registered Wikipedia user for precisely six days. And you, and he, want us to believe that becoming a Wikipedia admin is his heart's desire and the only thing he wants in all the world? Seriously? Ravenswing 02:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

• One modest postscript: I talked this over with my wife, who is an elementary school teacher teaching special needs students. She commented on her student "Ivy." Poor Ivy has a serious learning disability, and needs (and has permission to use) a calculator for her math work in class. None of her seventeen other classmates have such permission, they resent the hell out of it, and Ivy gets bullied over it. Unlike your son, Ivy doesn't have options. She doesn't get to not take math, and she doesn't get to opt out of the third grade, and she doesn't have Mom standing over her shoulder as a rabid protector. (Mom, with five different kids by five different fathers, isn't that invested anyway.) My wife's take is that your son being told he can't just be handed a position in the most widely read and used encyclopedia in world history -- one requiring maturity, discipline, arcane knowledge and high skill -- is very far indeed from her definition of "bullying." Ravenswing 18:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

To the mother of ~S.Brendan.S~

If you have been telling the truth this entire time, I'm very sorry for your loss. I can't imagine how you must feel, but this site is not the place for you to grieve. Further activity here will only keep negative experiences in your mind, when it would be better to remember the joy your son brought into your life. If you care about your son's continued image here, then just stop and walk away. Continued disruptive editing will only cause us to conclude that you are trolling the site in an offensively ghoulish manner, because there are some really sick people on the internet who very well would pretend to be the mother of a dying child just to mess with people. If you do nothing, this account will either be forgotten or maybe your claims will be taken at face value by later scholars of internet culture (possibly resulting in some sort of future reform). If you try to push us, people will assume you were just another troll. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

---