75.147.232.105

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

03:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

December 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arthur Aston (army officer) was changed by 75.147.232.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960628 on 2012-12-04T04:58:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm O.Koslowski. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Garr King, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, O.Koslowski (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jack Churchill because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gilliam (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Churchill with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 22:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pope Pius VI because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Manul 18:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo, you may be blocked from editing. Dinkytown talk 18:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Waterloo. Dinkytown talk 18:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of Waterloo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dinkytown talk 18:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Boxing, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Intracellular transport because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 16:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Intracellular transport with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 16:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Daniel Ortega— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

This is the only warning you will receive. Your continued vandalism, as you did to Hot Pockets, constitutes a long term pattern of abuse, and will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. General Ization ^Talk 20:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kajol has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016

Hello, I'm CyanoTex. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Angel Island (California)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CyanoTex (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Tompop888. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RMS Lusitania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. An edit that you recently made to Fruitarianism seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 21:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Your recent edit to Fruitarianism appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Hello, I'm JimVC3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Davis, California have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JimVC3 (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Davis Senior High School (California). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Davis Senior High School (California), you may be blocked from editing. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leonardo da Vinci High School. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Davis, California, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Davis, California. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2018

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Frida Kahlo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Frida Kahlo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Frida Kahlo, you may be blocked from editing. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 18:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to John McCrae— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

---