76.157.42.81

January 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2023

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at British Americans. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Dcasey98. Binksternet (talk) 23:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at British Americans. Peaceray (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Australian diaspora. You cannot simply remove cited material without presenting another citation from a reliable source. Peaceray (talk) 04:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 08:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of heavy metal bands. Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Continued block evasion by Dcasey98, also blocked as Yumalova and Grantfgh. This person uses various Chicago-area IPs and creates sockpuppet accounts. Binksternet (talk) 23:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

The bulk of the list page I was blocked from was unsourced - it's clear the issue is that I ran afoul of @Binksternet's persistent trend of anti-American deletionism across Wikipedia's various cultural pages. 76.157.42.81 (talk) 03:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

You ran afoul of Wikipedia's policies, same as every other time you got blocked. Now you're evading this block with Special:Contributions/50.230.140.178. Your behavior is the problem. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

No, that is the excuse you use every time someone runs afoul of your desire to de-emphasize and smother American cultural perspectives across Wikipedia on articles full of edits that reek of British jingoism and anti-American revisionism. You are manipulative and shady, costuming yourself as an administrator when you are not. You are content to disregard Wikipedia policy, so long as the edits made suit your particular biases. You cannot gatekeep cultural pages using neverending accusations of "block evasion" and "sockpuppetry" as an excuse. YOUR behavior is the problem, Binksternet, and because you are accountable to no one, you are free to bully, police narratives, lie, and disregard policy yourself. I will absolutely keep fighting against you as much as possible. You are a cancer on this website. 76.157.42.81 (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Comparatively, I'm a late-comer to the fight against your disruption. Back in 2016 you were quite a handful at multiple Harry Potter topics, the List of children's films, and a bunch of other stuff. Just a few minutes after you were blocked for a week as Dcasey98, you used the Chicago-area IP Special:Contributions/24.15.9.65 to restore your ridiculous notion that Hunger Games with its gory deaths and severe violence was a children's film.[1] That's when NinjaRobotPirate indeffed you. But no, you kept evading your blocks. FilmandTVFan28, Trivialist, MarnetteD and Betty Logan were barely able to keep you in check. You also hit the Men's rights movement with some hateful spew: "certain feminists looking to silence half of the population in order to keep gaining entitlements and gender supremacy." I didn't become aware of your disruption until three years later when you decided that punk rock was invented in the USA, which is nonsense. That's when you were using the IP range Special:Contributions/2601:243:400:F535:0:0:0:0/64, edit-warring at the same old articles such as the list of children's films. You've been a timesink and a nuisance with every "contribution" you make. Objective people looking at your edit history would immediately know who is the cancer here. Binksternet (talk) 05:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Access to this talk page is now limited to registered users for two days. During this time, unblock appeals can be sent to WP:UTRS, and after this time, edits that are not unblock requests using the {{unblock}} template will be reverted and lead to page-reprotection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!

Hello there! I am sending this alert to all members of the WikiProject Weather and editors who have recently edited in the realm of tornadoes.

There is a large and important discussion ongoing, with the goal to completely overhaul and improve the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. The previous improvement attempt back in 2022/2023 gained almost no participation. This alert is being sent out so these discussions hopefully gain a reasonably-sized participation, so the F5/EF5 tornado article, one of the most viewed weather-related articles on Wikipedia, can be improved for all readers!

If you wish to participate, please visit: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Possible F5/EF5/IF5 tornadoes. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

User is back after expiration of 1-year block. Could you reblock him @ToBeFree: --- FMSky (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi FMSky, the block reason back then was the addition of unsourced content; there have been no warnings since and the edits mostly seem to be removals rather than additions. I didn't check every edit, though. If there are specific diffs I should look at, please let me know! If it's not clear if a block is immediately needed, please provide a few warnings here and report (perhaps at WP:ANI) if the behavior persists. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 06:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

You routinely edit with a cultural bias across the music genre pages, as can be clearly seen through your typical habit of;

1. Deleting credit (or upholding deletions of credit) for the United States in summary templates, even where there is ample and/or explicit established foundational involvement from American artists.

2. Adding credit for the United Kingdom to "cultural origins" sections of summary templates, even when there is minimal if any sourced information to support such an addition. At the same time, you widely stigmatize and revert any such attempt to do the same for the United States, even with more in-text, cited support for such an addition than you typically have when you edit to add the United Kingdom.

3. Re-arranging the order of "cultural origins" sections of summary templates to read something like "the United Kingdom and the United States" (rather than vice-versa) whenever possible.

This to me seems like POV-pushing/bias on your part. My editing is not disruptive, I am upholding long-standing edits that you, almost exclusively, are altering to fit your anti-American/pro-British bias vis a vis music and music history. 76.157.42.81 (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

do you have some diffs (links) to support these accusations?

Who is asking? I've compiled plenty. 76.157.42.81 (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asian Americans in music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 01:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rock music. Block evasion by User:Dcasey98. Binksternet (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

I did not vandalize Wikipedia, Binksternet. The Beatles do not belong in that lede. You are a gatekeeping POV-pusher, and none of my edits are disruptive. The claim that the Beatles were at the forefront isn't justified with a source, and even if it was, it is subjective and nonsensical to claim that the Beatles alone were at the forefront of album popularization. 76.157.42.81 (talk) 10:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---