Your submission at Articles for creation: Kisbæk (January 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 77.233.241.212, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kisbæk

edit
 

Hello, 77.233.241.212. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kisbæk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of BMW has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brændende kærlighed. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brændende kærlighed was changed by 77.233.241.212 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88049 on 2017-11-16T13:36:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brændende kærlighed. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 04:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.