777 persona 777
June 2020
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, 777 persona 777. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Christopher Langan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Beyond My Ken Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Evaluating your editing and your behavior here and on Talk:Christopher Langan, it appears to me that you may have a confict of interest in regard to that subject. If you do, please read our policy on COIs and conduct yourself accorsingly. Even if you do not have a COI, please watch your behavior, as noted in my comment above. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello
editI just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that you are banned from posting comments on my talk page, unless, of course, you are required to by Wikipedia policy. If you are required to post a notice on my talk page, please clearly indicate in the edit summary what policy you are doing so under. Any other posted comments will be deleted without being read.
Please note that this ban also applies to pinging me.
Also, if you email me to get around this ban, I will assume that you are agreeing in advance that the entire contents of the e-mail can be released to anyone I wish to. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
777 persona 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
unfairly blocked in order to silence my point of view which has yet to been refuted
Decline reason:
You were being quite disruptive, emailing users aggressively, and generally ignoring policy. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.