777network

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Gülgöze, Midyat, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way) (my edits)} 12:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

What do you mean have a reliable source? I am Aramean, my father is from Iwardo, that is my source! If not, I am pretty sure the books of David Gaunt can assure you of what I speak. 777network (talk) 13:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

You can't cite yourself as a source. You can only write something on Wikipedia if there is a published source, which other readers/editors could theoretically check, that backs it up. (t · c) buidhe 14:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sayfo. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 14:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sayfo, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Wait what? I am from Midyat, I know this outside and in. You are the ones that need to stop this psychological warfare. There are no assyrians in Midyat, they are ALL Arameans and the source is ME because I am from there and there are thousands of sources! Don't change back or I'll report you. 777network (talk) 16:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

I have now added my source, you can both go to h3ll now, you erased hours of work for nothing. Stupid! 777network (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

You are not WP:RS. Read what WP:RS means. You are not a source of authority. I am partly from Tehran, so if I say everyone in Tehran rides donkeys instead of cars, does that mean we should believe that? It's an incredibly flawed logic. And feel free to report, you'll just get blocked. Also, please avoid WP:NPA. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Defence of Iwardo, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Listen dude. Stop annoying me. I am from AYNWARDO. I AM ARAMEAN. Do you not get that you have been lied to by the assyrians? Who has given you mandate to edit more than I do? Who are you again? 777network (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

No one cares about your background, it does not give you any special rights. Again, you are not a scholar, you are not WP:RS - in other words, your personal opinion/deductions mean zero. Continue, and you will be reported to WP:ANI. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

I am a scholar. I have given you reliable sources. So once again, what rights do you have to take it down? "I am going to report you" well sure you do, I am however reporting you to my Creator God for your lies about my people. Enjoy! 777network (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

No, you're not. No, you have not. Read WP:RS. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, even if you have WP:RS, that does not justify you removing/altering sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:777network/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 777network! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)