Welcome!

edit

Hello, 7alawa el3antbly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Professional wrestling throws may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The wrestler stands behind an opponent and applies a [[Professional wrestling holds#cobra clutch on his/her opponent, placing one of his/her hands against

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dean Ambrose has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bray Wyatt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bray Wyatt was changed by 7alawa el3antbly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895687 on 2014-05-17T13:25:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Seth Rollins. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 16:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ryback. STATic message me! 16:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for introducing unsourced changes after warnings to stop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dean Ambrose. NiciVampireHeart 09:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
As a result of a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, I checked your editing history, and found that you have been continuing exactly the sort of dubious editing that led to your recent block. I would probably have blocked you for a week, but in the course of my investigation I discovered that you had also evaded your block by creating another account. Using more than one account to get round Wikipedia policies, known as sockpuppetry, is unacceptable, and I have set the block length at one month. Any further sockpuppetry may lead to a much longer block, perhaps even an indefinite block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please note that I have extended this block to indefinite on the basis of the number of accounts now created, and the complete failure to abide by copyright and the requirement to source content - Peripitus (Talk) 12:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply