81.67.166.149

December 2019

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Talk:Southern Europe. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/81.67.160.238. Binksternet (talk) 16:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Binksternet, It's an abuse of power, You spread your personal ideas, You participate in the fact that wikipedia has become a collection of idiots. You give yourself your little power of censorship on the internet. It is not you who re-invent the definition of southern Europe--81.67.166.149 (talk) 11:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to French people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your interpretation of "romance" is ridiculous you participate in all the bullshit on wikipedia. It is not up to you to decide who should be blocked to allow you to put your nonsense. Your general knowledge is dismal. --81.67.166.149 (talk) 14:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Noted. In any case, at the very least you need to adhere to the principle that while the dispute is being discussed, the status quo ante version should remain in place, per WP:ONUS. El_C 14:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

I was blocked for correcting that romance is not an ethnic group but a linguistic family.--81.67.166.149 (talk) 12:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

why I was blocked ?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.67.166.149 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Is it possible to know the reason why I was blocked ? Users abuse their censorship rights and must be accountable or banned from wikipedia. It is because of these people that wikipedia became a fake new site. I REQUEST TO BE UNLOCKED 81.67.166.149 (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block is now expired. However, with an attitude such as you are displaying, you will likely be given a longer block quickly unless you change it. This is a collaborative environment where you must work with others of differing views in a civil manner. Wikipedia is not a news site, "fake" or otherwise. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. In addition, this is a privately operated website that has the right to dictate what is said here as it sees fit, just as you can dictate what others say and do in your residence. See WP:FREESPEECH. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A FRENCH PROPAGANDA

before thinking about blocking, look at the reason why we are asking for blocking. this becomes ridiculous, some user should be blocked like Binksternet --81.67.166.149 (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Southern Europe. Dr. K. 17:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

PROBLEM OF CENSUR Favonian

User:Favonian this individual blocked me for personal reasons that have nothing to do with Wikipedia

why I was blocked ?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.67.166.149 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Is it possible to know the reason why I was blocked ? Users abuse their censorship rights and must be accountable or banned from wikipedia. It is because of these people that wikipedia became a fake new site. I REQUEST TO BE UNLOCKED 81.67.166.149 (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block is now expired. However, with an attitude such as you are displaying, you will likely be given a longer block quickly unless you change it. This is a collaborative environment where you must work with others of differing views in a civil manner. Wikipedia is not a news site, "fake" or otherwise. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. In addition, this is a privately operated website that has the right to dictate what is said here as it sees fit, just as you can dictate what others say and do in your residence. See WP:FREESPEECH. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Southern Europe, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

See WP:LEAD. You are adding WP:OR on top of a valid lead (a summary of the topic). Stop. Materialscientist (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

---