82.110.109.210

Stale warnings

April 2006 – October 2006: 4 warnings

December 2006

Your recent edit to David Firth (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

January 2007

Your recent edit to Qshoot Limited (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 14:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -- Necrothesp 15:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Lead(II) nitrate on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Raven4x4x 09:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Necrothesp. By the way, a bet does not justify vandalism. -Mschel 18:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean bet?! Necrothesp is a bully and I intend to treat him the way he deserves. I am not so pathetic to do this for a bet.

Please do not add nonsense to another user's userpage, as you did with Necrothesp, it is considered vandalism. CopperMurdoch 10:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hot tub trev, you will be blocked from editing. Sander123 13:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Kukini, you will be blocked. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 07:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 16:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

UK vs US English

I noted your edit summary here. Are you sure you are not confounding journalistic and colloquial styles? In the US, they say "We got hammered", but journalists would write "We became inebriated". Do you have in mind some examples of well-written UK articles that say "up to then end of ..." instead of "through the end of ..."?? --Otheus 10:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I did some comparisons of google counts for the phrases for the Telegraph and for the Wall Street Journal. Of course, you are not only correct, but it is quite clear that this is the case. Thanks for the education. --Otheus 11:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Barry Scott, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Soosed 07:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ryu (Street Fighter), you will be blocked from editing. Kariteh 07:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Geek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DarkFalls ^talk 07:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gimp. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Muchness 01:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

No. 617 Squadron RAF: Revision as of 11:07, 4 September 2007 a member of Number IX squadron I presume. Changes like this do no one in the services a favour. --Philip Baird Shearer 23:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the RAF Scampton page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. John254 01:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jenna Bush‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Rklawton (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Future of Formula One

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Future of Formula One. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of Formula One. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ben MacDui 07:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Swindon, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raith Rovers F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Osnabrück mortar attack. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mo ainm~Talk 17:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vinehall School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 21:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Edge (wrestler) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm CabbagePotato. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Somme has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CabbagePotato (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kolo Touré. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sergi Canós, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Radio City (Liverpool), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

---