March 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Congress of Paris (1856), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Crimean War. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crimean War. JACKINTHEBOXTALK 04:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

page numbers!!

edit

We need page numbers for your citations of Yevgeny Tarle's Crimean War which is a two-volume book. That way, we can verify what you claim. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Crimean War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

brass tacks and hard facts

edit

Look, dude, we ought not keep doing this. I'm sorry that your life is like it is; I'm sure it's hard. You think that somehow this is contributing but you keep posting POINTy things and I have real doubts about your sources. I bet if I started checking them I'd find you were making some of this up. If you really want to contribute, you need to discuss first. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have to second Chris troutman's concerns here concerning your more recent edits at Lend-Lease. Please do state where you took the information from that you added to the article. Also, other Wikipedia articles are not a suitable reference (see WP:UGC).
Regards, HaeB (talk) 20:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Nigos. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Napoleon III, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigos (t@lk Contribs) 09:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Napoleon III, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nigos (t@lk Contribs) 09:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.