October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you recently removed content from Martine Croxall without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 17:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

"It was unclear to viewers whether Croxall was "gleeful" about Johnson's withdrawal or the "fast-moving news agenda"."
It was entirely clear to everyone what she meant. She even admitted in the same piece that we had probably broken the rules. It's interventions like yours (showing left wing bias) that have made me stop funding Wikipedia. 86.11.96.76 (talk) 10:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Diane Abbott seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.