August 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/en.hazratsultanbahu.com— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The following spam report is invalid and the removal is necessary.

Further to that the links i have taken action were applicable to do so since the information in present day no longer holds true. the website can be verified to be safe, spam free etc. thank you i hope you will realise this and take note and do the necessary?.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 19:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


NOTE: I HAVE STOPPED! HOWEVER Its not disruptive editing.If you need to verify the website to be spam free you can do that online on any website you want or if you want me to do that for you then let me know maybe i can help here. BUT BUT to mark a safe continuously as spam is incorrect reference to a site. Your duty is to help here not to call a correct action as disruptive?