92.31.136.211

May 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 22:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

@Green Giant: What's with the management of this website? You archived a newsletter twice, I removed one copy and an Arbitrator instantly blocks me for "disruptive editing". What happened to WP:AGF? Above my correction to your archive you discuss with Cyberpower a global lock of an editor whose cross-wiki vandalism was evidenced by revision deletion of contributions on several wikis. I'm not your nursemaid - you can either demonstrate bad faith editing from the accounts you locked or take your chance in the inevitable review. Your choice. 92.31.136.211 (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

And who asked you to fix my talkpage archives? It seems you appointed yourself to that task, in much the same way you are advocating for a locked account but trying to act as if it isn’t your account. You will have to appeal the block yourself or you can wait for it to expire. Green Giant (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Green Giant: So are you putting a time limit on this lock? 92.31.136.211 (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I was referring to the IP block which stops you editing elsewhere for 31 hours. There is no time limit on the lock you are asking about. We don’t have a formal appeal system for unlocking accounts, except you can make a request at m:SRG, send an email to stewardswikimedua.org, or you can ask on a stewards talkpage. The essential element is to say you think the account was wrongly locked and ask for it to be unlocked. No need for the extra drama you’ve added. Green Giant (talk) 23:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Green Giant:Before I do anything, do you think the accounts were correctly locked? 92.31.136.211 (talk) 23:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I’ve already answered your questions about the lock. I’m not going to answer any more unless you request an unlocking of the account in the way I’ve outlined. Green Giant (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Green Giant:If your action is an abuse of steward rights then whether or not somebody asked you to reverse it is neither here nor there. Your views on the propriety of your action will be taken into consideration should you choose to submit them. However, mitigating the consequences of it (by self-reverting) will be viewed more favourably than toughing it out to the end. You've made the perfectly reasonable request for somebody to ask for action before you do it. That request has been made. Your attempt to dictate the precise words in which the request is made will not be looked on favourably. Your other comments don't help your cause either:

• You complain about a correction to your archive, although you made precisely the same correction yourself four minutes later. This morning "Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi" altered a user's post on the user's talk page. Are you going to rush to chastise him?
• You admit that you perform administrator actions on wikis on which you are active but claim it is "a rare once-in-a-Blue-Moon situation". There was a "blue moon" shortly before your first admin action here on en:wp and another shortly after. The next is October 2020. So we would not expect more than three admin actions in three years. You have performed twice that number in the last three months alone.
• When asked for information an interrogation follows. When Cyberpower asked you why you were performing admin actions on wikis you are active on you didn't argue with him, you just supplied it. Why the difference in approach here?
• You would also do yourself a favour when Cyberpower comments by not rising to the bait. He was the one who first suggested that yesterday he advocated an unban of somebody against consensus. Nobody else mentioned it. 92.31.136.211 (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

  Knock it off. I did not advocate to unban anyone, nor did I have any intentions to advocate to unban anyone. I don't know where you are getting this fantasy from, but no one will take you seriously trying to assert your point with non-existent "facts".—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 20:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

• Why are you trying to rearrange my talkpage archives? Green Giant (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

---