95.83.253.150

June 2014

Hello, I'm Piguy101. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Nicholas McDonald, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Piguy101 (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicholas McDonald, you may be blocked from editing. Piguy101 (talk) 23:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

Hello, 95.83.253.150. You have new messages at Piguy101's talk page.
Message added 23:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Piguy101 (talk) 23:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Top Billin'. Piguy101 (talk) 23:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.83.253.150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't deserve to be blocked

Decline reason:

As one of the few admins with the authority to look at what got you blocked, it was entirely deserved. Block sustained. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should not have blocked me. Please unblock me

---