99.19.71.139

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on List of University of Michigan faculty and staff. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (99.19.71.139) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Peaceray (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Science and Predictive Analytics (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data Science and Predictive Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Data Science and Predictive Analytics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 99.19.71.139! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Could someone please review this new Wikipedia draft book page - Draft:Data Science and Predictive Analytics - and let me know if it meets the Wikipedia:Notability_(books) criteria for publishing?

Note: User:Sulfurboy previously commented that This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

I've reviewed the Wikipedia instructions on Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability), Wikipedia:Notability_(books), and Help:Referencing_for_beginners, but I may be missing the main objection and wanted community input.

• Wikipedia:Notability_(books) Criterion 1: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books. Supporting evidence:
  • Independent scholarly reviews by journal editorial staff (independent of the book publisher or author).
    • International Statistical Institute (ISI) Review .
    • Journal of the American Library Association review .
    • Many dozens of citations in scholarly literature that cites this textbook .
  • Note that the above are not really "just passing mentions". Rather these represents dozens of independent published works that provide deep scholarly reviews the textbook and directly cited the work.

• Wikipedia:Notability_(books) Criterion 4: The book is, or has been, the subject of instruction at two or more schools, colleges, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country. Supporting evidence:
  • There are at least 2 universities (UM and UCLA) that offer classes using this textbook .
  • The book is used in at least a dozen libraries .

Many thanks your help.

Some references cited above:

References

99.19.71.139 (talk) 02:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC) 99.19.71.139 (talk) 02:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm going to close this off, since Sulfurboy has responded to your question already on their talk page.

Please read footnote 7 attached to criterion 4. There is a distinction between a book being the object of study in a course and being adopted as a textbook for a course.

There may still be a case made for the book's notability. Don't give up easily! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Science and Predictive Analytics has been accepted

Data Science and Predictive Analytics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

---