Your submission at Articles for creation: Dreamland Fun & Adventure Park (September 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, A.hi15hi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanal Potty (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanal Potty (March 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 02:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Dreamland Fun & Adventure Park concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dreamland Fun & Adventure Park, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dreamland Fun & Adventure Park

edit
 

Hello, A.hi15hi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dreamland Fun & Adventure Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Sanal Potty concern

edit

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sanal Potty, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sanal Potty

edit
 

Hello, A.hi15hi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanal Potty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit
 

Hello A.hi15hi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ray O. Johnson, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:A.hi15hi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=A.hi15hi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Dr. Pinsky.
I kindly submit that I am not being paid directly or indirectly for the edits I am making. I am aware of the policies of Wikipedia editing and would make sure to abide by the rules and integrity of Wikipedia articles. A.hi15hi (talk) 05:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Advanced Technology Research Council (September 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rakanya (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Slywriter,

I could see that my article has been declined.

I saw that the reason provided is it does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines.

Could you kindly help regarding this as I had provided around 10 citations for the page.

I kept the article short because there was a higher chance of getting accepted, otherwise there is a lot about this organization which can fit into this page.

Could you kindly advise?

Happy to rework.