A116erin
| This user is a student editor in UCLA/Anthropology_116S_(Winter) . |
Practice introduction for Week 1 Assignment
editHi A116erin. My name is Marie, your classmate from Anthro 116S. I hope you're having a great start to your winter quarter. Good luck on the class project! --Macf95 (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
````Hello Marie. I hope you are having a great start to your winter quarter as well.
Welcome!
editHello, A116erin, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Article Evaluation
editThe article that I evaluated is titled "Archaeology of the Philippines." I have provided my notes on the article in this section. I noticed that some of the references links in the article did not work.For instance,the link for the reference titled "The Philippines: Archaeology in the Philippines to 1950" by Alfredo Evangelista did not work. Furthermore, the reference link for "Researchers discover fossil of human older than Tabon man" by Howie G. Severino did not work. I feel that the source links not working may cause the reader to question if the claims in the article are accurate. The article cited the reference titled "The Philippines: Archaeology in the Philippines to 1950" by Alfredo Evangelista frequently. However, due to the reference link not working I did not find the claims to be supported. To avoid this questioning, I suggested on the article talk page that the links for the references should be updated. I feel that the reference links not working may be the reason why the article was "nominated for deletion" as stated on the articles talk page. Also, I feel that the title is slightly vague. The article discusses colonialism frequently, and thus, I feel the article could improve by being more specific about what will be discussed in the article. I also felt that the article did not go into enough detail about the Rizal-Bulacan Archaeological Survey.I feel that providing more sources for this section would help make the article stronger. Overall, I felt reviewing this article was helpful.A116erin (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is the link for the article I reviewed. ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_of_the_Philippines A116erin (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)