Archive 1 (Sep 25, 2004 - October 31st, 2005) - My First Archive

Archive 2 (Nov 1, 2005 - Dec 20, 2020)

January 2023

edit

  An article you recently created, Draft:GPT-4, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 02:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You basically erased my work from history. There's no more Draft:GPT-4. Couldn't you just have added or modified information, added references etc? I created it as a stub so it could develop, as all Wikipedia articles do. I used to put a lot of time since 2004 for a few years, but then Wikipedia got invaded by people like you that want to control everything and don't accept anything that is outside your establish boundaries. People like you make me hate doing any editing in Wikipedia. AAAAA (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question about GPT-4

edit

Hello. I'm just curious if your article Draft:Draft:GPT-4 was generate by an AI? Thanks a lot. Looking forward to your feedback. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The initial stub, YES. I created it using AI. Then I added some information I found in an article. But then a couple Wikipedia editors deleted all my work and now it doesn't exist at all. BAD PEOPLE! AAAAA (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Did you verify that the AI-generated statements were correct? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, and I did make some modifications to the initial stub. AAAAA (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Draft:GPT-4

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Draft:GPT-4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is a human-written page at Draft:GPT-4. This page has no value and is made-up, as GPT-4 isn't released yet.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"This page has no value and is made-up, as GPT-4 isn't released yet."
So... it's OK to delete the page I made but not OK to delete the current GPT-4 page that was made by someone else? AAAAA (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

FlashForge moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, FlashForge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: FlashForge (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AAAAA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of GPT-5

edit
 

The article GPT-5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Speculative article, per WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WindTempos (talkcontribs) 15:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have started an AfD process for this, as mentioned below. StereoFolic (talk) 10:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of GPT-5 for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GPT-5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GPT-5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StereoFolic (talk) 10:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GPT-5 (September 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:FlashForge

edit

  Hello, AAAAA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FlashForge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:FlashForge

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:FlashForge has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply