ADHZ07111989

March 2014

Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyediting

Hey, thanks for your recent contributions. I just want to give you a couple of pointers—first, be careful about removing templates. You've removed a couple of templates, such as {{Use Indian English}}, that shouldn't be removed at all, and you've removed {{copyedit}} templates without fixing the problems that the templates refer to. Also, please avoid correcting spellings from one variety of English to another. Spellings like "neighbourhood" and "traveller" are not incorrect; they are just limited to certain parts of the English-speaking world. Cheers! —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ADHZ07111989, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

This ID is unique.

Since Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple same ID and same Registration, this ID not multiply, and I haven't another active ID of Wikipedia. Thank's.

Thx

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm referring, in particular, to your now-reverted edit to my talk page. Since it is devoid of substance (not even referencing a particular page that I edited), I consider it a personal attack. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry dude, I only intended to helping you. Thank's. In don't mind your refusal. Since my contry has own technolgy and scince privacy. Don't blame we for this. Thank's (talk), 15 March 2014 (UTC)

This was past article version deletion tag. I make new article with wikipedia criteria. New content and new references with authentic historical text at ctext.org and historoical books.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank's

Thanks dude, please help me. Hmm... In change of it, some source code of ,C, VB, .net, Eclipes, or etc? I know your kindness. I also a Programmer too, thanks pal. Maybe we share our code?

New articles

Hi, following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Later Sui Empire I think editors requested that more rigorous sourcing be applied to your work on history articles. I just had an editor bring Talk:Dương Dynasty (An Nam) to my attention - it looks dubious frankly. The same goes for this which appears to have been created despite it being refused by User:Joe Decker above and this for China. What's going on? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

对不起，我不明白你的英语。 I am a native speaker of English, but I cannot understand your English. I think you may be from China? Then please write in Chinese. 日本語も大丈夫です / nói tiếng Việt không có vấn đề / 한국어도 아무 문제가 없다. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I has been answer your oblige at your talk page from me "From ADHZ07111989". I am native Indonesian. I studied Mandarin, English and some foreign language too. Wo she Yin Tu Ne Xi Ya Guo de ren, Wo xie ren pien de hua yu, ing wen, re ben hua, he se hen pien de hua. Xie Xie peng you. Ren Shi ni wo hen gao hao xin jie. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Oke, tidak ada masalah. Anda juga dapat menulis dalam bahasa Indonesia pada halaman diskusi. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Later Sui Empire has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Later Sui Empire. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 08:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Draft:Later Sui Empire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fiddle Faddle 19:50, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Please delete the Draft:Later Sui Empire. I Want to make new draft. Thanks. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Later Sui Empire, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Stating that you intend to re-create this nonsense is not constructive. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Why is it not contructive? I only requested to remove previously draft to make new face. I am also using article wizard too.

The Later Sui Underground Civilization (Hou Sui) is made of legal text and authentic historical text. Please reconsider and restore the article. Please remove the previous of previous deletion submission of draft: Later Sui Empire since not valid again to current draft.

It is stated that the Later Sui Empire need more references. So, I already add more cite and references at current version and also improved sentences.

Please help me and let's corporate with me. The solution clear. And I am use more cite of more books and legally historical authentic chinese text as appear at online sources just like ctext.org. Thank'sADHZ07111989 (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

70.39.186.232 (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào (620 - 630) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào (620 - 630) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! ADHZ07111989, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=The article is not hoax, since its using authentic text list at the references and some books. Who said the article is hoax?}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This is related to your repeated creation of hoax articles, which will not be undeleted. If you persist after this block expires, you will likely be blocked indefinitely. Nyttend (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Read the comments by Narutolovehinata5 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Later Sui Empire. Let me be clear: this topic has been proven to be a hoax, I blocked you because you were adding hoaxes unrepentantly, and any more will result in a permanent block. Nyttend (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

No, I will not give you permission, nor help you, to build a hoax. Nyttend (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

This is my final answer: you will not get permission. Nyttend (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Why sir?

Please visit the ctext.org and see there at Song-Ming section it is not about era of legacy Sui it is about Later Sui II " http://ctext.org/song-ming " upsurp at the era. See about the text above.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC) ADHZ07111989 (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Why? Because hoaxes are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Drop this matter immediately: if you wish to continue editing, write about a different topic. Any more advocacy of the nonexistent Later Sui will result in the indefinite block that I already mentioned. Nyttend (talk) 19:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

What "Alternate history" means

Please read our article on Alternate history. Alternate history is a form of fiction. Your article on the Later Sui Empire was based off of this alternate history wikia. The website you cited says that their material is fictional. If there was a later Sui Empire, there would be other sources about it, but there are none. In short, it is fictional. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• Attention please.
• The references for Later Sui Empire are:

• References

   *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006.
   *梁惠王章句上 page 6
   *西遊記 part 朱紫國唐僧論前世　孫行者施為三折肱
   *廣韻 Part 上平聲 Bab 支 Lineage 隨
   *廣韻 part 上平聲 Domain 脂 Title 伊
   *太平御覽,人事部五十六,《孝女》
   *《草木四》 Part 《叙牡丹》 Page 1
   *之 Part 葘
   *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006.
   *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006.
   Hawley, Samuel (2005). The Imjin War. Japan's Sixteenth-Century Invasion of Korea and Attempt to Conquer China. Seoul: The Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch. pp. 195f. ISBN 89-954424-2-5.
   Turnbull, Stephen (2002). Samurai Invasion. Japan’s Korean War 1592–98. London: Cassell & Co. p. 244. ISBN 0-304-35948-3.
   Roh, Young-koo (2004). "Yi Sun-shin, an Admiral Who Became a Myth". The Review of Korean Studies 7 (3): 13.
   *鬼三十五 Part 《浮梁張令》
   *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006.

The online version of references can you read at ctext.org, as follow:

   *梁惠王章句上 page 6

夫，音扶。浡，音勃。由當作猶，古字借用。後多放此。周七八月，夏五六月也。油然，雲盛貌。沛然，雨盛貌。浡然，興起貌。禦，禁止也。人牧，謂牧民之君也。領，頸也。蓋好生惡死，人心所同。故人君不嗜殺人，則天下悅而歸之。蘇氏曰：「孟子之言，非苟為大而已。然不深原其意而詳究其實，未有不以為迂者矣。予觀孟子以來，自漢高祖及光武及唐太宗及我太祖皇帝，能一天下者四君，皆以不嗜殺人致之。其餘殺人愈多而天下愈亂。秦晉及隋，力能合之，而好殺不已，故或合而復分，或遂以亡國。孟子之言，豈偶然而已哉？

   *西遊記 part 朱紫國唐僧論前世　孫行者施為三折肱

三皇治世，五帝分倫。堯舜正位，禹湯安民。成周子眾，各立乾坤。倚強欺弱，分國稱君。邦君十八，分野邊塵。後成十二，宇宙安淳。因無車馬，卻又相吞。七雄爭勝，六國歸秦。天生魯沛，各懷不仁。江山屬漢，約法欽遵。漢歸司馬，晉又紛紜。南北十二，宋齊梁陳。列祖相繼，大隋紹真。賞花無道，塗炭多民。我王李氏，國號唐君。高祖晏駕，當今世民。河清海晏，大德寬仁。茲因長安城北，有個怪水龍神，刻減甘雨，應該損身。夜間託夢，告王救迍。王言准赦，早召賢臣。款留殿內，慢把棋輪。時當日午，那賢臣夢斬龍身。

   *廣韻 Part 上平聲 Bab 支 Lineage 隨

隨:隨：從也，順也，又姓風俗通云隋侯之後漢有博土隨何後漢有扶風隨蕃。旬爲切，三。隨:隋：國名本作隨。《左傳》云：漢東之國隨爲大漢初爲縣後魏爲郡又改爲州隋文帝去辵

   *廣韻 part 上平聲 Domain 脂 Title 伊

伊:伊：惟也，因也，侯也，亦水名又州本伊吾廬地在燉煌之北大磧之外秦末有之漢爲伊吾屯隋爲郡貞觀初慕化内附置伊州焉又姓伊尹之後今山陽人。於脂切，五。

   *太平御覽,人事部五十六,《孝女》

孝女: 《唐書》曰：劉寂妻夏侯氏，滑州胙城人，字碎金。父長云，為鹽城縣丞，因疾喪明。碎金遂求離其夫，以終侍養。經十五年，兼事后母，以至孝聞。及父卒，毀瘠殆不勝喪，被發徒跣，負土成墳，廬於墓側，每日一食，如此者積年。貞觀中，有制表其門閭，賜以粟帛。 又曰：于敏直妻張氏，營州都督、皖城公儉之女也。數歲時父母微有疾，即觀察顏色，不離左右，晝夜省侍，宛若成人。及稍成長，恭順彌甚。適延壽公于欽明子敏直。初聞儉有疾，便即號勇自傷，期於必死。儉卒后，凶問至，號哭一慟而絕。高宗下詔，賜物百段，仍令史官編錄之。 又曰：楊紹宗妻王氏，華州華陰人也。初年三歲，所生母亡，吻繼母鞠養。至年十五，父又征遼而沒。繼母尋亦卒。王乃收所生母及繼母尸柩，并立父形像，招魂遷葬訖，又廬於墓側，陪其祖母及父墳。永徽中，詔曰：「故楊紹宗妻王氏，因心為孝，率性成道。年迫桑榆，筋力衰謝。以往在隋朝，父沒遼左，招魂遷葬，負土成墳，又葬其祖父母等，竭此老年，親加板筑。痛結晨昏，哀感行路。永言志行，嘉尚良腎攏宜標其門閭，用旌敏德。」賜物三十段、粟五十碩。 又曰：孝女賈氏，濮州鄄城人也。始年十五，其父為宗人玄基所害。其弟強仁年幼，賈氏撫育之，誓以不嫁。及強仁成童，思共報復，乃候玄基殺之，取其心肝，以祭父墓。遣強仁自列於縣，有司斷以極刑。賈詣闕自陳己為，請代強仁死。高宗哀之，特制賈氏及強仁免罪，移其家於洛陽。 又曰：汴州李氏孝女，年八歲，父卒，柩殯在堂十餘載，每日哭泣無限。及年長，母欲嫁之，遂截發自誓，請在家終養。及喪母，號毀殆至滅性。家無丈夫，自營棺槨，州里欽其至孝，送葬者千餘人。葬畢，廬於墓側，蓬頭跣足，負土成墳，手植松柏數百株。季昶列上其狀，制特表其閭，賜以粟帛。

   *《草木四》 Part 《叙牡丹》 Page 1

牡丹花，世謂近有。盖以隋末文士集中。無牡丹謌詩。則楊子華有晝牡丹處極分明。子華北齊人，則知牡丹花亦已久矣。出尚書故實又謝康樂集。亦言竹間水際多牡丹。而隋朝種植法七十餘卷中。不說牡丹者，則隋朝花藥中所無也。出酉陽雜爼

   *之 Part 葘

夔：夔龍亦州名春秋時魚國漢爲魚復縣梁隋皆爲巴東郡唐初改爲信州又改爲夔州取夔國名之又獸名似牛一足無角其音如雷皮可以冒鼓。

   *鬼三十五 Part 《浮梁張令》

頃為隋朝權臣一奏。遂謫居此峯。爾何德於予，欲陷吾為寒山之叟乎。令哀祈愈切。仙官神色甚怒。俄有使者，齎一函而至，則金天王之書扎也。仙官覽書，笑曰。關節既到，難為不應。召使者反報，曰。莫又為上帝譴責否。乃啟玉函，書一通，焚香再拜以遣之。凡食頃。天符"符"原作"府"，據明鈔本改。乃降。其上署徹字。仙官復焚香再拜以啟之，云。張某棄背祖宗，竊假名位。不顧禮法。苟竊官榮。而又鄙僻多藏，詭詐無實。百里之任，已是叨居；千乘之富。今因苟得。令按罪已實。待戮餘魂。何為奏章，求延厥命。但以扶危拯溺者，大道所尚；紓刑宥過者，玄門是宗。狥爾一甿。我"我"原作"俄"，據明鈔本改。全弘化，希其悛惡，庶乃自新。貪生者量延五年。奏章者不能無"無"原作"書"，據明鈔本改。罪。仙官覽畢，謂令曰。大凡世人之壽。皆可致百歲。而以喜怒哀樂。汨沒心源。愛惡嗜欲，伐生之根。而又揚己之能，掩彼之長，顛倒方寸，頃刻萬變。神倦思怠，難全天和。如彼淡泉。汨於五味。欲致不壞。其可得乎。勉導歸途，無墮吾教。令拜辭。舉首已失所在。復尋舊路，稍覺平易。行十餘里。黃衫吏迎前而賀。令曰。將欲奉報，願知姓字。吏曰。吾姓鍾。生為宣城縣脚力。亡于華陰，遂為幽冥所錄。遞符之役，勞苦如舊。令曰。何以勉執事之困。曰。但酧金天王願曰。請置子為閽人，則吾飽神盤子矣。天符已違半日，難更淹留。便與執事別，入廟南柘林三五步而沒。是夕，張令駐車華陰，決東歸。計酬金天王願，所費數逾二萬，乃語其僕曰。二萬可以贍吾十舍之資糧矣，安可受祉于上帝，而私謁於土偶人乎。明旦，遂東至偃師，止于縣館。見黃衫舊吏，齎牒排闥而進，叱張令曰。何虛妄之若是。今禍至矣。由爾償三峯之願不果。俾吾答一飯之恩無始終。悒悒之懷，如痛毒螫。言訖，失所在。頃刻，張令有疾，留書遺妻子，未訖而終。出《纂異記》

I don't care about any fiction made from the Later Sui II Empire.

Please give me permission to make it or in exchange of that please help me make the article.

ADHZ07111989 (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Solved. I think it is free to make the article then.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 13:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Zanhe. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

He do false editing of my page. Thanks. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Firstly, it's not your page. Secondly, edits you disagree with are not vandalism. Thirdly, calling any other user "stupid" and "VANDAL" is a personal attack. You are expected to conduct yourself on Wikipedia in accordance with the community's standards; if you cannot do so, you are liable to be blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ADHZ07111989. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 14:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yunshui ^雲_水 14:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Zanhe (talk) 20:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This block is related to your continued addition of fictional material to Wikipedia articles, compounded by personal attacks against other users. As I said upon blocking you before, continued hoaxing would result in a permanent block. Nyttend (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ADHZ07111989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me (I am ADHZ07111989) user Zanhe is not goodwill agains me. Please prevent him to block me. Please remember Wikipedia is international text not only Zanhe private area. I do get enough references for my contributed page (remember Wikipedia is allow of using international text not only his Zanhe area or region text. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ADHZ07111989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I created some history pages that another user side see as hoax. The another user block me, instead help me. History just like a line, wee add new things at the line with something new we found, so do me. I already uses cite web and books for references at all of my contributed articles. Help me give me unblock. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 06:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's a long way from a persuasive unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ADHZ07111989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me because it is not necessary, actually. History just like a line, We add new things at the line with something new we found, so do me. Altough my conflicted article has been seen in another page and labeled AH but it is not accurate since the website also contain another where is mixed, and please see there are another pages are history also label AH in that website too. Herewith my collected reference of my conflicted article listed bellow (for Later Sui 2 regime in the Ming Dynasty). *References *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006. *梁惠王章句上 page 6 *西遊記 part 朱紫國唐僧論前世　孫行者施為三折肱 *廣韻 Part 上平聲 Bab 支 Lineage 隨 *廣韻 part 上平聲 Domain 脂 Title 伊 *太平御覽,人事部五十六,《孝女》 *《草木四》 Part 《叙牡丹》 Page 1 *之 Part 葘 *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006. *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006. Hawley, Samuel (2005). The Imjin War. Japan's Sixteenth-Century Invasion of Korea and Attempt to Conquer China. Seoul: The Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch. pp. 195f. ISBN 89-954424-2-5. Turnbull, Stephen (2002). Samurai Invasion. Japan’s Korean War 1592–98. London: Cassell & Co. p. 244. ISBN 0-304-35948-3. Roh, Young-koo (2004). "Yi Sun-shin, an Admiral Who Became a Myth". The Review of Korean Studies 7 (3): 13. *鬼三十五 Part 《浮梁張令》 *Dragon Tales: China’s History from Tang to Qing. Singapore: Singapore: Asiapac Books. 2006. The online version of references can you read at ctext.org, as follow: *梁惠王章句上 page 6 夫，音扶。浡，音勃。由當作猶，古字借用。後多放此。周七八月，夏五六月也。油然，雲盛貌。沛然，雨盛貌。浡然，興起貌。禦，禁止也。人牧，謂牧民之君也。領，頸也。蓋好生惡死，人心所同。故人君不嗜殺人，則天下悅而歸之。蘇氏曰：「孟子之言，非苟為大而已。然不深原其意而詳究其實，未有不以為迂者矣。予觀孟子以來，自漢高祖及光武及唐太宗及我太祖皇帝，能一天下者四君，皆以不嗜殺人致之。其餘殺人愈多而天下愈亂。秦晉及隋，力能合之，而好殺不已，故或合而復分，或遂以亡國。孟子之言，豈偶然而已哉？ *西遊記 part 朱紫國唐僧論前世　孫行者施為三折肱 三皇治世，五帝分倫。堯舜正位，禹湯安民。成周子眾，各立乾坤。倚強欺弱，分國稱君。邦君十八，分野邊塵。後成十二，宇宙安淳。因無車馬，卻又相吞。七雄爭勝，六國歸秦。天生魯沛，各懷不仁。江山屬漢，約法欽遵。漢歸司馬，晉又紛紜。南北十二，宋齊梁陳。列祖相繼，大隋紹真。賞花無道，塗炭多民。我王李氏，國號唐君。高祖晏駕，當今世民。河清海晏，大德寬仁。茲因長安城北，有個怪水龍神，刻減甘雨，應該損身。夜間託夢，告王救迍。王言准赦，早召賢臣。款留殿內，慢把棋輪。時當日午，那賢臣夢斬龍身。 *廣韻 Part 上平聲 Bab 支 Lineage 隨 隨:隨：從也，順也，又姓風俗通云隋侯之後漢有博土隨何後漢有扶風隨蕃。旬爲切，三。隨:隋：國名本作隨。《左傳》云：漢東之國隨爲大漢初爲縣後魏爲郡又改爲州隋文帝去辵 *廣韻 part 上平聲 Domain 脂 Title 伊 伊:伊：惟也，因也，侯也，亦水名又州本伊吾廬地在燉煌之北大磧之外秦末有之漢爲伊吾屯隋爲郡貞觀初慕化内附置伊州焉又姓伊尹之後今山陽人。於脂切，五。 *太平御覽,人事部五十六,《孝女》 孝女: 《唐書》曰：劉寂妻夏侯氏，滑州胙城人，字碎金。父長云，為鹽城縣丞，因疾喪明。碎金遂求離其夫，以終侍養。經十五年，兼事后母，以至孝聞。及父卒，毀瘠殆不勝喪，被發徒跣，負土成墳，廬於墓側，每日一食，如此者積年。貞觀中，有制表其門閭，賜以粟帛。 又曰：于敏直妻張氏，營州都督、皖城公儉之女也。數歲時父母微有疾，即觀察顏色，不離左右，晝夜省侍，宛若成人。及稍成長，恭順彌甚。適延壽公于欽明子敏直。初聞儉有疾，便即號勇自傷，期於必死。儉卒后，凶問至，號哭一慟而絕。高宗下詔，賜物百段，仍令史官編錄之。 又曰：楊紹宗妻王氏，華州華陰人也。初年三歲，所生母亡，吻繼母鞠養。至年十五，父又征遼而沒。繼母尋亦卒。王乃收所生母及繼母尸柩，并立父形像，招魂遷葬訖，又廬於墓側，陪其祖母及父墳。永徽中，詔曰：「故楊紹宗妻王氏，因心為孝，率性成道。年迫桑榆，筋力衰謝。以往在隋朝，父沒遼左，招魂遷葬，負土成墳，又葬其祖父母等，竭此老年，親加板筑。痛結晨昏，哀感行路。永言志行，嘉尚良腎攏宜標其門閭，用旌敏德。」賜物三十段、粟五十碩。 又曰：孝女賈氏，濮州鄄城人也。始年十五，其父為宗人玄基所害。其弟強仁年幼，賈氏撫育之，誓以不嫁。及強仁成童，思共報復，乃候玄基殺之，取其心肝，以祭父墓。遣強仁自列於縣，有司斷以極刑。賈詣闕自陳己為，請代強仁死。高宗哀之，特制賈氏及強仁免罪，移其家於洛陽。 又曰：汴州李氏孝女，年八歲，父卒，柩殯在堂十餘載，每日哭泣無限。及年長，母欲嫁之，遂截發自誓，請在家終養。及喪母，號毀殆至滅性。家無丈夫，自營棺槨，州里欽其至孝，送葬者千餘人。葬畢，廬於墓側，蓬頭跣足，負土成墳，手植松柏數百株。季昶列上其狀，制特表其閭，賜以粟帛。 *《草木四》 Part 《叙牡丹》 Page 1 牡丹花，世謂近有。盖以隋末文士集中。無牡丹謌詩。則楊子華有晝牡丹處極分明。子華北齊人，則知牡丹花亦已久矣。出尚書故實又謝康樂集。亦言竹間水際多牡丹。而隋朝種植法七十餘卷中。不說牡丹者，則隋朝花藥中所無也。出酉陽雜爼 *之 Part 葘 夔：夔龍亦州名春秋時魚國漢爲魚復縣梁隋皆爲巴東郡唐初改爲信州又改爲夔州取夔國名之又獸名似牛一足無角其音如雷皮可以冒鼓。 *鬼三十五 Part 《浮梁張令》 頃為隋朝權臣一奏。遂謫居此峯。爾何德於予，欲陷吾為寒山之叟乎。令哀祈愈切。仙官神色甚怒。俄有使者，齎一函而至，則金天王之書扎也。仙官覽書，笑曰。關節既到，難為不應。召使者反報，曰。莫又為上帝譴責否。乃啟玉函，書一通，焚香再拜以遣之。凡食頃。天符"符"原作"府"，據明鈔本改。乃降。其上署徹字。仙官復焚香再拜以啟之，云。張某棄背祖宗，竊假名位。不顧禮法。苟竊官榮。而又鄙僻多藏，詭詐無實。百里之任，已是叨居；千乘之富。今因苟得。令按罪已實。待戮餘魂。何為奏章，求延厥命。但以扶危拯溺者，大道所尚；紓刑宥過者，玄門是宗。狥爾一甿。我"我"原作"俄"，據明鈔本改。全弘化，希其悛惡，庶乃自新。貪生者量延五年。奏章者不能無"無"原作"書"，據明鈔本改。罪。仙官覽畢，謂令曰。大凡世人之壽。皆可致百歲。而以喜怒哀樂。汨沒心源。愛惡嗜欲，伐生之根。而又揚己之能，掩彼之長，顛倒方寸，頃刻萬變。神倦思怠，難全天和。如彼淡泉。汨於五味。欲致不壞。其可得乎。勉導歸途，無墮吾教。令拜辭。舉首已失所在。復尋舊路，稍覺平易。行十餘里。黃衫吏迎前而賀。令曰。將欲奉報，願知姓字。吏曰。吾姓鍾。生為宣城縣脚力。亡于華陰，遂為幽冥所錄。遞符之役，勞苦如舊。令曰。何以勉執事之困。曰。但酧金天王願曰。請置子為閽人，則吾飽神盤子矣。天符已違半日，難更淹留。便與執事別，入廟南柘林三五步而沒。是夕，張令駐車華陰，決東歸。計酬金天王願，所費數逾二萬，乃語其僕曰。二萬可以贍吾十舍之資糧矣，安可受祉于上帝，而私謁於土偶人乎。明旦，遂東至偃師，止于縣館。見黃衫舊吏，齎牒排闥而進，叱張令曰。何虛妄之若是。今禍至矣。由爾償三峯之願不果。俾吾答一飯之恩無始終。悒悒之懷，如痛毒螫。言訖，失所在。頃刻，張令有疾，留書遺妻子，未訖而終。出《纂異記》

Decline reason:

You were blocked for trying to do this. The only way anyone would consider unblocking you is if you promised to never edit anything relating to Asian history again. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ADHZ07111989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• To never edit anything relating to Asian history again is to much for me. *Just go to the basic request of forbid the Later Sui (AH) version. I Promised to not start the project of Later Sui (AH version) again. *But how about if in the future another wikipedian start the page of "Later Sui (year of 1418-1644)", and prove that become not AH or in other word proven History? Hence that not forbid the article again? *I accept the condition to not make again the particullar page of "Later Sui (AH version) (year of 1418-1644)" only for my self. But if another wikipedian start it and prove the article not hoax or recent proven history. Will I get the chance to make constribution to "Later Sui (year of 1418-1644)"? *Please give me permission for make edit and costribution of Asian history page and another page, except for start the "Later Sui (AH version) (year of 1418-1644)" article page, so that please unblock me.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 14:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

(1) As far as I can make out from your attempt to communicate in English, you seem to be saying that you will not create one specific fictitious article again, but that you may add to it if another account creates it. You also say nothing about creating other fiction. That is not enough of a reassurance. (2) Your entire editing history, all the way from March 2014 to this latest unblock request, makes it clear that you do not have the competence in English needed to edit an English language encyclopaedia. You have a history of replacing perfectly good English in articles with garbled English, which means that either other editors spend time cleaning up after you, or else articles continue to contain nonsense. Unblocking you would therefore be likely to do more harm than good to the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ADHZ07111989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1)The block reason is about ban of the article "Later Sui (AH Version) during 1418-1644". And I was accepted the condition which forbid me from build the article (not for other user with some change to prove it as not fiction in future, maybe). (2)The additional grammar reason is not relevant to this indefinite block. Maybe for the grammar reason is only definite block not indefinite block. I ready for more edit in wikipedia, and honestly I check and re-check the English grammar which I use with certain grammar checking software. So it was guaranteed proper English grammar. The differences maybe only just grammar style. Thank You ADHZ07111989 (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your command of English is clearly insufficient for you to work on the English language Wikipedia (and there is no grammar checking software that is remotely good enough to guarantee proper English grammar). I strongly recommend that you stick to the Wikipedia in your native language. As I see no real possibility of your being unblocked here in the near future, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page - WP:UTRS is still open to you as a means of appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I am ADHZ07111989

1. I am sorry but I can't use WP:UTRS because the requirement. I am not higher tool access such as sysops, bureaucrats, and stewards in addition to Wikimedia Foundation Community Advocacy staff. Thank you, I will enjoy the block untill unblock grant.
2. Access requirements UTRS access is limited to users who have undergone a community vetting process for higher tool access such as sysops, bureaucrats, and stewards in addition to Wikimedia Foundation Community Advocacy staff. Access is granted through an admin registration screen and may take 24–48 hours to complete.

36.79.104.53 (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Actually ADHZ07111989

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào (620 - 630) (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào (620 - 630) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào (620 - 630)

Hello, ADHZ07111989. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Hou Sui of Yáng zhèngdào".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dương Dynasty (An Nam) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dương Dynasty (An Nam) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dương Dynasty (An Nam) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)