Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, ASchutz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Wikipedia has some special ways to deal with references, you can find more information on WP:CITE. If I can help you out with your references on the article your working on, let me know, and I can give you a hand. Happy editing! Martijn Hoekstra 16:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note, that if you disagree with any of my edits, you can allways undo them. Martijn Hoekstra 21:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

references

edit

Hi, I'll try to quickly explain how references work in Wikipedia. First thing to note: You have been using Harvard referencing. That is fine, in principle, but because Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, and jumping about in the text is easier, as is quickly looking something up, many prefer the use of footnotes. footnotes work with the <ref> element. Everything between a <ref> and a </ref> element is taken as a reference, and replaced in the text with a number, that refers to that note. The notes themselves then appear where the element <references /> is.

It is easy to repeat a reference by naming references. That works as follows:

this is some text we have a reference for.<ref name=myreference>This is the content of the reference. This will appear at the <references /> tag</ref> This is some more text, and coincidently, the same source can be used to source this statement aswell.<ref name=myreference />

Another usefull 'trick' of Wikipedia are templates. Templates are some formatted information, that with a few parameters that you put into the template, make some sort of output. One example is the {{referencelist}} template. This template contains the <references /> elements, and markup elements to format the list of references (which explains why you don't see the <references /> element anywhere in the source of the text). Another one you have seen is the [[template:cite book|{{cite book}} template]]. This template ordens and formats information about a book in a neat fashion.

The standard practice of using references (although not strictly neccecairy) is using templates like the {{cite book}} template, or for example the {{cite web}} template between the reference tags. A full reference will then look something like this in wikimarkup: <ref name=theNameOfTheRef>{{cite book|isbn=the isbn number|autor=the author|title=the title|publisher= the publisher etc.}}</ref>

here is what it will look like on the page:[1] This is the text following the referenced sentence. The references tag is below this line. I am first going to repeat the referene though, by calling it by its name.[1]

  1. ^ a b the title. the publisher etc. ISBN the isbn number. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help); Unknown parameter |autor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Take a look at the source with edit this page to see it for yourself. There are nowiki tags too, you can ignore those, they are here to prevent the tags I have just typed to actualy be expanded. If you have any more questions, just ask. Martijn Hoekstra 10:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ethnomethodology

edit

Please post at WP:EAR. I am travelling in Europe now and not able to respond easily. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message, but I'm afraid I don't feel I can assist you in this matter either, as I know very little about the topic. I would advise you to seek help at WP:Dispute resolution - hopefully you'll get some useful assistance there. Robofish (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply