User talk:ATS/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Kona Lanes

And thank you for all your hard work on this great article. Googie was the best. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I got the first message about finding photos. Several photos on Flickr have non-prohibitive copyrights.

• Go to Flickr and in "advanced search" check all 3 boxes under "only search within Creative Commons-licensed content".
• Save the largest sized picture to your computer.
• Go to [1]. (this is the "Flickinfo tool" from this page [2])
• Enter the Flickr URL for the largest-sized photo you just downloaded. This tool will extract the photo's info. Then "open upload form". Under "licensing", select "uploaded to Flickr Creative Commons Attribution 2.0". Then upload.
• Don't forget to copy down the file name.

Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Much obliged :)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Googie architecture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• California]] with its "fieldstone walls, large angled eaves and an inherent sense of campiness." (Scott Martelle, ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kona Lanes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2002, with its "fieldstone walls, large angled eaves and an inherent sense of campiness." (Scott Martelle, ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'']]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Photo requests

I posted on the Googie talk page about the need for photographs of some of the remaining sites. Thought you might be interested. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:18, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll take a look, thank you. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 03:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Just in case it isn't obvious

... no, I'm not actually selling ad space... xD —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ATS. You have new messages at Clarkcj12's talk page.
Message added 17:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Note to self

Work on Clint Grant. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 00:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Altgens FAC

ATinySliver, my apologies for not going to the Ike Altgens FAC earlier, even though I said that I would go take a look at it, and now it seems like I'm too late. If it's any consolation, I doubt that it would've passed anyway, even with my input. I suggest that you make requests for reviews earlier so that you have plenty of time to address concerns. To make up for dropping the ball, I wouldn't mind doing an informal peer review of the article, and this time I promise to get to it sooner. That way, my Catholic guilt will be assuaged and the article will be more prepared the next time you submit it to FAC. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Christine—if it helps, "dropping the ball" hardly rests on your shoulders; it certainly was a group effort here. I listed it, read the concerns, addressed the concerns, and watched as nothing happened. Literally, nothing happened. Even after spamming a few reviewers, nothing happened. Then, it's closed and archived because nothing happened. With appropriate apologies to your Catholic sensibilities, fuck it. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 18:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Ha ha. Listen, I sympathesize; I've been in similar situations plenty myself, so I know it can be exceedingly frustrating. I feel your pain, man. Maybe if you had asked more people? I dunno, sometimes it just happens. So...what can I do? Are you telling me to pursue romance with my SO, or you telling me to forget about it? ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Your SO is an "it"?! Sorry to hear that...

But, seriously, if there was something you were inclined to do in the future with this article, I'd certainly support that. As for actually taking part in that process again, nope. I'm done. (And, I did ask everyone on the short list.) :D —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

You are so hilarious! Wow, I don't know what to tell you...<grimace> Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 02:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Tell me lies. Tell me sweet little lies. Tell me lies. Tell me, tell me lies. xDDD 04:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Zapruder

He said something along the lines in his testimony; "...being I was here and he was hit on this line and he was hit right in the head--I saw it right around here, so it looked like it came from here and it could come from there".

Also, like Altgens, I think Zapruder deserves more mention that just over 11,930 words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.141.241 (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	You have actually just brightened up my day so thanks :) We need more editors like you! :) Regards - -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Much obliged. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Did you know Lincoln was smiling after he was shot?

I have posted words from Katherine M. Evans account about Lincoln smiling after he was shot on several articles because I cannot put one on here due to the article being protected. In "We Saw Lincoln Shot" by Tim Good, on page 148, Katherine M. Evans said Lincoln WAS smiling after he was shot; "I looked and saw President Lincoln unconscious, his head dropping on his breast,his eyes closed, but with a smile still on his face". While it may be an unnecessary detail, I just thought it would be good, bittersweet and heartwarming to let readers, especially fans of Lincoln know that Mr. Lincoln actually did hear Hawk's funny line and passed into unconsciousness with laughter and a smile on his face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.135.101 (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

An interesting tidbit, thank you. I noticed you've also left this on the article's talk page, as you should. I neither patrol Assassination of Abraham Lincoln nor am I familiar with its history, so with any luck someone who is will act accordingly. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 17:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Emma Watson

Hi,

I notice you reverted an edit on Emma's page, and you have previously commented on the British use of the term "semester". Actually, I don't think we British ever use this particular word at all (nor tremester). In the UK, the academic year is divided into three "terms", and if we were to refer to something happening at the end of one we would indeed say "end of term" (without the definite article). The word "semester" is distincly American English and so it isn't really possible to exemplify its usage in British English. This isn't really terribly important, but I guess that since Emma is attending an American institution it is correct to use American terminology. Since that terminology has no active use in British English, I'd say that on this occasion the American approach is the one we should adopt, notwithstanding that the article is written in British English.

I don't think many people care whether the word "the" is included or not and I don't mean to criticize - just to clarify :) TriumFant (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello @TriumFant: and thanks for the note. As an American I'm always on the lookout for items that will help me with articles about Brits (a onetime colleague and I wrote most of Karen Dotrice, for example). I've found several articles referring to both "end of term" and "end of semester", so removing "the" seemed correct. I was not aware of the semester/term distinction; thanks for passing it on. Cheers! :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 23:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Message

Hello there, friend. I remember you created a Userbox for my a while ago and was wondering if you could create one for me that says something like: "This user is unquestionably a total psychopath". Obviously it's a joke, and if you go to my userpage and see my front picture, you will understand perfectly. :) Best regards. Jonas Vinther (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jonas Vinther: hello! Since images in userboxes must be free, I have a few potentials for you. I can crop your own image or perhaps use one of these:

• File:"Joker" graffiti in Amsterdam.jpg
• File:SVG black joker.svg
• File:WeaponFocusEffect.jpg
• File:Evil Me.jpg

Let me know. Cheeers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 01:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

If you could use my own picture, that would be awesome. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jonas Vinther: how's this?

This editor is obviously a
total psychopath.

"obviously" links to joke; "total psychopath" links to Joker (comics). Of course, you can change that or any attribute for that matter. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

It looks awesome mate. Thanks so much. By the way, does creating a userbox take a lot of time or is a 2 minute thing? because, I would also love one that says "this user is founder and chairman of a company", but if it's a big deal I, of course, won't trouble you. Jonas Vinther (talk) 21:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jonas Vinther: it normally doesn't take very long; you likely already copied the code when you edited this page, so experiment with colors and images (images in userboxes must be free, no fair-use) using your own sandbox, which I just created for you. (The userbox template is here, providing the various parameters, usually only a small handful of which are used.) Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, mate. Jonas Vinther (talk) 21:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

(←) @Jonas Vinther: also, lose the colon in front of "{{userbox"—that was only to indent here. xD —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Noted. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 21:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emma Watson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• watson-is-flawless |title=21 Times Emma Watson Proved She Is the Most Flawless Woman of the Decade"] |website=BuzzFeed |date=29 May 2014 |accessdate=31 May 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indie Rights may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Nelson Madison Films|reason=to preserve the edit history following a page move per [[WP:N]]).|date=October 2014}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

bureaucracy and WP

Please don't be deterred by the bureaucracy here. This is after all a very large enterprise, with thousand of people working independently at the same time with almost no formal coordination, almost no supervision, and very little training. to help deal with it, a number of formal conventions have been established. Unfortunately, the sort of people that like to work here are exactly the sort of people who are not very skilled at drawing up formal conventions or procedures, and the net result is a mass of partially contradictory instructions and rules, some important, some not; some enforced, some not. The response to a rule that has proven impractical is usually to add several supplementary rules, rather that to revise the original, and after 11 years, it produces quite a jumble.

Some of us find it fun to manipulate the rules to get a reasonable result. But the true purpose of working here is to build an encyclopedia, and I will normally try to get to a reasonable result as directly as possible. Some people though insist on their interpretation of the rules regardless of the result, and I have also become rather experienced at countering them in their own frame of reference when necessary. As I'm pretty much an inclusionist on most topics, I tend to concentrate at AfD and AfC.

My advice is to concentrate on providing good sourced articles. If you want to learn process, don;t be afraid of making errors. There's no other way to do it, because you need to learn not the letter or the rules, but the way we use the and the accepted boundaries. DGG ( talk ) 17:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you @DGG: for the note, it's very much appreciated. You may find, especially if you've read my user page, that I do try to keep these ideals in mind in spite of the occasional frustration. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 18:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Warnings

Uncivil

Hello, I'm Spshu. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. For making veiled personal attack at "...as evidenced by the dozens of editors who've taken you to task therefor." "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done." --Spshu (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Uncivil2

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Note that everyone is a volunteer here. You are holding me to an investigative standard for tagging Indie Rights, when you fail to note this is a volunteer based operation, so I have no obligation to "..or learn to actually contribute thereto." Per Wikipedia:Civility: "Nobody likes to be bossed about by an editor who appears to believe that they are "superior"; nobody likes a bully." You clearly don't follow your own advice just in attempt to pin "self-appointed notability watchdog" with the addition of the Notability tag at Medical Cadet Corp. If you did investigate, you would find one of the recommended and one of my preferred methods of dealing with non-notable articles, but you did not do so. --Spshu (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Uncivil3

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You make as you point out a "gloating post" and still leave it as a "gloating post". Spshu (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Improper cavassing

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. You have found canvassing editors (Ian Rose Nikkimaria, Figureskatingfan) to vote in your favor at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie Rights in exchange for "favors". Spshu (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Uncivil4

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:DGG. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. "Kilroy was here" Spshu (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Fucking hilarious. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Right, hilarious that you point to my post that indicated that you basically would go off on a childish tantrum. Spshu (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello ATinySliver:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

WP:GAN

I see you are attempting to combat the bot at WP:GAN. The bot will insist that the proper content for WP:GAN is the content in the {{GA nominee}} template on the article talk page. You must make your changes there.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@TonyTheTiger: Bloody hell! I didn't see it because it's within the template, invisible unless editing. Thank you! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 10:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ike Altgens

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ike Altgens you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Location -- Location (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Greetings, @Location:, and thanks for initiating the review! I have replied on the review page. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 00:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas!!
	Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!    –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 19:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

IPadPerson (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Talkback

Hello, ATS. You have new messages at IPadPerson's talk page.
Message added 22:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

IPadPerson (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ike Altgens

The article Ike Altgens you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ike Altgens for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Location -- Location (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

GPO FYI it was the Government Printing Office at the time the cited documents were published, the name change was very recent. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@MrBill3: much obliged. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bianca Ryan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bianca Ryan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 06:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cloudz679: Thank you! Looking forward to it! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 06:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

On hold

The article Bianca Ryan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bianca Ryan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bianca Ryan

The article Bianca Ryan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bianca Ryan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cloudz679: thank you! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 23:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Table formatting

I didn't realize that rowspans caused formatting issues like that. Good to know. Thank you! --Kbabej (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

@Kbabej: You're welcome. Happy editing! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 02:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop WP:WIKIHOUNDING

I would really appericate it if you would stop wikihounding me like you've been doing at RfP, twice actually. Just because someone nominates an article you contributed to for deletion doesn't mean you should go and undermine everything else they are doing. Any further attempts and I will request an IBAN. It was the first time you ever commented at an RfC so it was kinda obvious. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 02:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

@EoRdE6: Seriously? Four hours later? I had legitimate concerns with your ability to collaborate with other editors. These concerns were exacerbated with this edit, summarized by "withdrawn, this is getting nowhere". It went somewhere, all right—resoundingly in the opposite direction from your intent. Then, in your zeal to argue with everyone who disagreed, you flat out lied to us (your research into the article's history argues strongly against this being a mere oversight, assumptions of good faith notwithstanding).

Meantime, don't threaten me. Want to recommend a ban? Just do it. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 02:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	How could I not give you one :) Thanks for the laughs :) - Its nice to have a laugh on here for once it really is! At 3am you've cracked me up which is a very rare in itself Thanks and Keep up the great work! :) –Davey2010Talk 03:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC) I was doing this at 2:45 and then had the Blue screen of death!, It goes from a jumping mouse to a barely functioning laptop - Lord help me!

Aw, thank you! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 03:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

AN/I Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Diff: is here
EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 03:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Not a vio

The Brown article: As it was worded prior to your last change, it really wasn't a violation of OR/SYNTH if you looked at the references attached to the content. It's fine the way it is now, but it would have been fine if it had stayed the way it was. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 06:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@Winkelvi: Hello! I have in fact read the cited source—in fact, all of them since joining in the care-taking of this article. I just read it again, and still don't see where "public perception" is "complicated" by the announcement. If we can't point to someone actually saying so (and even a news reporter would need to cite such an assertion), it is a vio. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 06:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Content preceding what I had edited (and you reverted out again) already set up the wording. In fact, after reverting me (twice) you even edited that wording and didn't see a problem with was was already there. Here is what I'm referring to, Sliver: "The announcement caused controversy when it was revealed that, before becoming romantically involved with Gordon...". The controversy already existed with public and family perception, the wedding announcement and then the reveal of their non-marriage continued the controversy over their entire relationship. So no, not OR/SYNTH at all. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually—and, good catch, I completely glossed over that—that should read something to the effect that it caused controversy within the family (edit: all I can find in reliable sources re any public "controversy" is some unspecified "critics"), and the cited source doesn't really support even that. I'll be fixing it presently. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:34, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm sensing some article ownership happening. I edit the article, you revert it or immediately change it. What's up with that? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

@Winkelvi: that's not correct, and no ownership or disrespect is intended. I'm fixing things I see that strike me as wrong, regardless of who made the edit. (And I changed "her" to "Houston"—not having researched its editor—because "Brown ... her" struck me as potentially confusing. Not all of us are proficient in English, and I try to keep that in mind when editing. (Edit: also, "being involved" is grammatically poor; it's essentially newsspeak, giving a false sense of something still happening that should be in the past tense.) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 03:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by "not all of us are proficient in English". We don't dumb down English Wikipedia articles because not everyone reading said articles speak/read English as a first language. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

(←) I neither intend nor advocate "dumbing down"; I advocate clarity. The English Wikipedia entertains people the world over, not all of whom are proficient with the language. If I believe something requires clarity, I will be bold in making an edit that I believe benefits the reader and, therefore, the article and, therefore, the encyclopedia. Even speaking within the parameters of your apparently intense dislike of "that" (), there are occasions in which its omission is grammatically inaccurate and/or creates a meaning different than intended. This is among the changes I will make to—admittedly belaboring the point—improve an article—if, again admittedly, as I see it. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Um, Wikipedia isn't meant to "entertain" anyone. It's an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia deserves -- no, it demands -- encyclopedic prose. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Agreed and expected, including of myself. Meantime, with respect, you misinterpret my use of "entertains", defined in this case as accepting or hosting visitors. (Edit: that having been said, I would argue that—alright, alright, I would argue—your definition of "entertains" is too narrow. Is not reading and learning a form of entertainment, or have we eschewed something so fundamental? []) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Appreciate the thank you

I'm sorry about my feeling a little gun-shy. Whichever way you want to capitalize the sentence is perfectly fine with me. --Tenebrae (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

@Tenebrae: for what it's worth, I think you were right the first time. Be bold and change it right back if you want. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

You're very gracious, and I sincerely thank you. I've had some rough patches with a couple of editors and I'm trying to steer clear of certain things. I appreciate your graciousness. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please Move Edit War Thread

Please move your edit war thread to the edit war noticeboard. Twinkly can generate a nicely formatted report if you go to the other users page a select ARV. If not, please supply links and diff's. Thanks EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 02:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

You closed it ... —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 02:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

because it's in the wrong place and will not get a response there. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 02:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

A bit of advice

Per WP:POLEMIC, you might want to delete this [3] before someone makes a stink about it. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This ...

... is CNN —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 06:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice (for the IP's, not really you)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 19:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Replied, and my thanks. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 19:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kszapsza. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminder. I'll try to remember that the next time I'm attacked by a pseudo-journalist and his minions. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 19:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kona Lanes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kona Lanes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Wizardman. I look forward to it! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

The article Kona Lanes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kona Lanes for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The article Kona Lanes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kona Lanes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The few words about Polish language

I believe that you can use Google Translator, but you chose bad version of translation. Yes, of course "Pan" means "Lord", but not only. It also means "Sir" or "Mister", maybe in USA is other tradition, but in Poland we always say "Panie" (for men) or "Pani" (for women) to strangers. Max Kolonko also uses this form, when he says to us. Kubala95 (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Do not edit other user's comments without permission

Please, do not edit other user's comments without permission.

Thank you.

Have a great day,

— Cirt (talk) 02:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, re-read your talk page comments and actions there, I think you were well-intentioned and good meaning there. Just came off sort of as a shocker to see my comments edited by someone that was not myself. Thanks for your talk page participation there at the article discussion page. Much appreciated! — Cirt (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@Cirt: You are correct, I was moving my own comment; "editing" yours was evidently an unwanted side effect. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 02:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Ah, in that case, once again, please accept my sincere apologies for my above initial tone. — Cirt (talk) 02:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

My thanks, and apologies unnecessary. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 02:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Smileys

Noticed your use of {{smiley|size=20px}} for at Talk:Leonard Nimoy
{{P}} or {{=D}} is a simple way of getting a wp:smiley, though not quite as large as your coding, You can use {{P|size=30px}} for a larger though. {{P|biggrin}} or {{=D}} = . 220 of ^Borg 05:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Ah, much obliged! I've used {{p|grin}} before, which is the same as {{p|biggrin}}. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

So they are! , grin '' and biggrin ''. I thought they were different! to me! 220 of ^Borg 05:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

—ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 06:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Leonard Nimoy

You are past WP:3RR on Leonard Nimoy. Please stop edit warring and begin discussion at Talk:Leonard Nimoy#Quinto Quote. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah stop being a bully editor over at the Nimoy site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs)

Sorry you feel that way, but the reversion of your edit was correct. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 10:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Just delete my account you faggot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs)

Sorry. I am neither gay nor an administrator. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 10:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry nobody will have me to kick around for much longer anyways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsamcat (talk • contribs)

Which reminds me: were you actually planning to contribute to an encyclopedia—which requires the collaboration of everyone involved—or are you going to keep announcing your retirement over and over? —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 11:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)