Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Mean as custard (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 18:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

A A UCL - IMB (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a part of my course, please try to understand! A A UCL - IMB (talk) 2:42 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Per below. Note that you will be reblocked if you revert back in the same or similar material. NeilN talk to me 19:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This does not exempt you from having to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I'm willing to unblock only if you stop adding unacceptable content and actually work on adding encyclopedic content, instead of just copying and pasting PR fluff. --NeilN talk to me 18:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

So basically the problem was because I copied and pasted stuff from other website ? If I change the way to say the same phrase, would be Ok? Thanks for your patience A A UCL - IMB (talk)

No, Wikipedia article aren't here to regurgitate an organization's marketing material, even if reworded. If you want to add content about various projects, find third party sources that cover the project and summarize what they say. --NeilN talk to me 19:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for taking your time to answer my question! Finally you have helped me to understand about this matter. Do you mind to unblock me ? Please. Thanks a lot again!!! A A UCL - IMB (talk)
Thanks a lot again!!! Have a nice day. A A UCL - IMB (talk)
Did you not read the unblock message? Any reason why you should not be reblocked? --NeilN talk to me 20:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a lot again for the precious time you are giving, just read your message, finally you are so kind for not re-blocking me again! A A UCL - IMB (talk)
You didn't answer my question. --NeilN talk to me 20:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Revert back in the same or similar material, is the correct answer?
When I unblocked you, I told you not to revert back in the same or similar material. Yet you did just that. [1] Why? --NeilN talk to me 20:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ok, all these things are getting complicated for me, I just give up .
I'm not sure what is complicated. Are you unclear as to what a third party source is? --NeilN talk to me 04:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yep, now i am quite clear about third party source ( I think, hopefully ) , the main issue here is that we are not having any support from anyone so you can really understand in what position I am right now ! Thanks a lot for taking your time to answer every my question. If I make another mistake, please forgive me. I appreciate al lot, it means a lot for me.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Open Knowledge, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sam Smith, Macedonia and Jonathan Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello, A A UCL - IMB and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File uploads

edit

Your file uploads are listed at Commons:Special:Contributions/A_A_UCL_-_IMB.

Some of these files are made by other organizations, but you made a claim when you uploaded them that they were your own work.

Could I ask you to correct the copyright claims? If the file has a free license, as you indicated on some of the "Open Knowledge" files, then those are in order so long as you applied the correct license. For other files when you claimed to hold the copyright, can you either correct the copyright notice if it is a freely licensed file or otherwise tag the file for deletion?

Let me know if I can help. I am not sure why you claimed to be the copyright holder for so many files. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just requested to cancel my images because I am not the owner of them, thanks a lot again. Very Helpful.