Help

edit

{{helpme}} I spent hours and hours revising my Maybach Foundation draft, adding citations etc, and frequently hitting the save button, but it has reverted to its state of December 31st, 2008. I'm heartbroken having spent many, many hours on it. What happened to it?

Also my other page, intended to be a redirect page, because the foundation is commonly known by more than one name, was deleted by someone. I thought my talk page was an appropriate place to experiment, why would someone delete one my pages I was working on, if it was under my talk pages and not published to the wikipedia?

Did you work on User:A Friendly Nerd/maybach foundation as well as User:A Friendly Nerd/draftMaybach Foundation? As for the deletion of the redirect, you can't have a redirect to a non-existent page; these will be deleted as worthless. BencherliteTalk 00:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oh thank you! I guess I got confused somehow. What a relief! And re: the redirect page, I thought that anything I put on my talk page was immune to the regular rules while I work on it. I won't make a redirect until I am done with the page and ready to post it. Thanks so much for your help A Friendly Nerd (talk)
No problem. You can always see what you've been doing by clicking on "my contributions" in the top right-hand corner of your screen. You can see someone else's contributions, incidentally, by clicking on the "User contributions" link in the toolbox on the left-hand side of the page when you're in somebody's userspace. BencherliteTalk 08:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, A Friendly Nerd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

BencherliteTalk 08:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Maybach fair use.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Maybach fair use.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Hi, can we please restore this file you deleted?

edit

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

A Friendly Nerd/Maybach Foundation oops

edit

Do you still need A Friendly Nerd/Maybach Foundation oops? It's in the article space and I think it's an inferior copy of User:A Friendly Nerd/maybach foundation. If you don't need it any more, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Thanks, (EhJJ)TALK 02:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the accidental move to Mayback Foundation. I have moved the page now to Maybach Foundation. I have also replied to your questions at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#please help me get this image publishable?. If you don't object, I'd like to upload the better quality, official logo from the official website and use that in the article. As a result, the image you uploaded would be deleted. Feel free to take the initiative on this. Otherwise, I'll do it tomorrow. All the best, (EhJJ)TALK 02:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you I have done as you asked. Pardon my rookie mistakes. I can't believe how many I seem to be making! I would be very grateful if you would use that better image. I had gotten the impression that wasn't kosher, and I will learn a lot by watching how you do that. A Friendly Nerd (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I made many when I started and even today I've had a bit of a "rough patch" (i.e. moving your work to a misspelled article name). I'll upload it to File:Maybach Foundation logo.png and include the necessary notices. You had it just about right, but using copyrighted material on Wikipedia can be tricky and needs very clear wording (hence, finding the right template helps very much). (EhJJ)TALK 05:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

While I have your attention, I wonder if I could enlist your aid in one other task I'm having difficulty learning. I learned that the Foundation has a couple of other names it is commonly known by. One is the official but rarely used name "The Wilhem and Karl Maybach Foundation". The other is the former name that they later changed, "Maybach Family Foundation". I would think redirects would be good from those names to the article I created, but after searching the help pages, I found myself very uncertain on how that is done. Can you point me to instructions for that? Thank you for your time.

A Friendly Nerd (talk) 05:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I didn't see this earlier. You need to create new pages and enter the following: #REDIRECT [[Maybach Foundation]] . That should create a page that redirects to the Mayback Foundation article. Try doing it here: Maybach Family Foundation. If it works, you need to make your way to alternate names and do the same thing. Good luck and be bold. (EhJJ)TALK 04:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

May I continue to ask you a couple of questions in this venue? And thank you very much for your help on those other issues. A Friendly Nerd (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is a non-free logo which has been replaced with a newer official version: File:Maybach Foundation logo.png

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:File:Maybach logo invite fair use 2.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (EhJJ)TALK 04:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit

(EhJJ)TALK 03:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Hickman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Avengers and New Avengers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply