Aadhitharajan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Murugaatrupadai (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Murugaatrupadai.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Skr15081997 (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Aadhitharajan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Draft:Murugaatrupadai concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Murugaatrupadai, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Murugaatrupadai

Hello, Aadhitharajan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Murugaatrupadai".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Murugaatrupadai}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saravanan Saran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saravanan Saran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Felixandrew26, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

for (;;) (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, if you felt like that. But I can assure that I'm not a sock puppet. Aadhitharajan (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Cited Reference

Please stop reverting edits backed by reliable sources. - Saffron White Green (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@Saffron White Green: Some of your edits where disruptive to the Neutral Point of view of the articles and has been reverted on assumed GOOD FAITH. The citation provided with the statement isn't supporting the statement. If you have any further concern regarding the article, please discuss it in the talk page. Thank you. Aadhitharajan^talk 18:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aadhitharajan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

What to do with suspected paid editing

Hi Aadhitharajan. The {{admin-help}} template isn't the best way to deal with examples like this. Generally speaking, in cases of egregious promotion, you can simply make a report at WP:AIV (or WP:UAA if there's an obvious username violation as well). If the situation is less clear-cut, the best venue is WP:COIN. Thanks for helping prevent promotional editing! Yunshui ^雲_水 14:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @Yunshui:, I will post it on the right place. Aadhitharajan^talk 02:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature has an unclosed italic ('') tag, causing Missing end tag lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Aadhitharajan|Aadhitharajan'']]<sup>[[User talk:Aadhitharajan|talk]]</sup> : Aadhitharajan^talk

to

[[User:Aadhitharajan|Aadhitharajan]]<sup>[[User talk:Aadhitharajan|talk]]</sup> : Aadhitharajan^talk

—Anomalocaris (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Anomalocaris:

, thanks for pointing me that. I was not aware of it as it's made years back. I have now updated my signature and made some little tweaks. Thanks again.

Aadhitharajan^talk 23:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Are you sure? As of this last posting, your signature is the same one with the unclosed italic ('') tag. —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:57, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I have again made a edit. That edit wasn't saved. Thanks, Aadhitharajan^talk 05:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Saravanan Saran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saravanan Saran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saravanan Saran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 20:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)