User talk:Abeg92/Archive 1
A tag has been placed on John Tilley (Pilgrim), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why John Tilley (Pilgrim) is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and leave a note on Talk:John Tilley (Pilgrim), explaining how John Tilley (Pilgrim) is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Elomis 07:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Conv - Andy M. Wang
editI have made about 2600 edits to Wikipedia. Congratulations on over 1180 edits yourself! Here is a website to keep track of your edits. This is for your account. To view mine, just change the name in the address. (By the way, I created some new articles.)
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Abeg92&site=en.wikipedia.org
By the way, thanks for the Wakkawakkajuju thing.
Abeg, I need your attention on the following users: User:Birdman1 and User:Leo628. I can tell you who they are later. Look at their contributions. Birdman1 started a new article. We really need to give Birdman1 a comprehensive tour (to signatures, preferences, watching pages, manual of style, basic reverting, 3RR, edits, userboxes (?), admin privileges, etc.)
WOW! Good job with your edits on March 3 and 4th! I learned some stuff from your edits and new comments! Thank you!
BARNSTAR PLACED ON USERPAGE
Welcome to Esperanza!
editWelcome, Abeg92, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.
Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact our administrator general Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!
Admin coaching, etc.
editAre you ready to get started?
The waiting time over at Admin coaching is long (some people have been waiting in line since July). I'm an admin coach with the project, and for my students I set up a group discussion page so that we could all learn from each other. The scope of this concept has expanded into the Virtual classroom, which is an open forum for the teaching and learning of advanced Wikipedia skills.
Anyone and everyone is welcome to participate, as a student, as a coach, or both. Every week or two a new major topic of discussion or classroom assignment is introduced, usually with a guest writer who presents his or her expertise on the current subject and who remains on hand to answer questions. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the discussions, such as sharing your expertise, asking and answering questions, etc.
The current topic of discussion is vandalism, and our guest writer is Budgiekiller.
All discussions are open-ended, so all previous discussion topics and classroom assignments are still there for viewing and further participation. There are also sections for posting miscellaneous topics and questions, requesting coaching assistance, etc.
In addition to inviting those who would like to learn, I routinely invite experts from all over Wikipedia to come and contribute for the benefit of all. The VC is rapidly turning into a clearing house of the best resources, methods, and techniques known for working on Wikipedia.
You are cordially invited to participate.
Here's an announcement box which you can place on your userpage or at the top of your talk page for keeping up to date with classroom assignments.
I hope to see you there. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 07:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Quick headsup
editAs requested, I replied to you at my talk page. --Pakaran 22:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
When an article has been tagged for speedy deletion, and the original author blanks the page, this is generally considered to be, effectively, a surrender to the deletion. Rather than restoring the article with the old db tag, the appropriate response is to replace the bank page with the template {{db-blanked}}, which basically translates to: "Author has blanked the page - go ahead and delete it." Fan-1967 18:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I figured that's what you were doing. Just wanted to let you know that's the one time when a blanking should not result in a simple revert. If the second-to-last version has a db tag on it, check the history and see if the blanker was the original author. If so, mark with the {{db-blanked}} tag (not to be confused with {{db-blank}}, which is a totally different tag) instead of restoring. Fan-1967 18:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. Abeg92contribsBoomer Sooners! 18:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
BarnStar!!!
editRickK BARNSTAR PUT ON USERPAGE
- Abeg92, WOW! Congratulations! I wish I had a barnstar before you. You are doing so much better than me. Good job, keep it up and keep on editing profusely. :) -- A. Wang (talk/contrb.) 00:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Abeg92. I took a quick look at Team environment. A few comments. First if a Prod notice is removed you should not replace it. Once a prod has been challenged - for example by being removed - it should not be replaced. Second, you don't give a reason in the Prod notice why the article should be deleted. Giving a reason based on specific policies the article violates is always a good idea. Finally if a Prod is challenged, you should take it to AfD. We don't usually delete articles that have been through prod without an AfD discussion.
All that being said, it is clearly nonsense and I have deleted it on that basis. If you find nonsense articles like this in the future the best thing to do is to tag it for speedy deletion with {{db-nonsense}}. Thanks, Gwernol 02:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent help on California Gold Rush
editThanks for your recent help reverting vandalism on the California Gold Rush article. As you may be aware, the California Gold Rush article is set to be the Main page Featured article in about 48 hours, beginning at midnight UTC, February 14, 2007. You are probably also know that Main page articles typically undergo substantial vandalism beginning about now, peaking during the Main page appearance, and continuing for some days thereafter. Assistance from all who have helped in the past with this article is very much appreciated during these next five days or so! NorCalHistory 23:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
OH NO!!
editYes, that's right, I do assert to be the same user as commons:User:Abeg92. Abeg92contribs 13:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
You helped choose Rwandan Genocide as this week's WP:ACID winner
editConfused?
editAbeg, I think you might be confused, or perhaps clicked on the wrong page. You recently warned me with {{test}} about a good-faith comment I made on User talk:Abcarter. Please be more careful in future. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I figured it was something like that. No biggie. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
64.230.16.82
editThis guy needs a block. Crested Penguin 06:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to Fatty acid. Just one minor nit to pick. Given the contributed content ("so and so is a big fat whore...") I don't think that using {{uw-test1}} is at all appropriate. I mean, I'm all for being gracious, but saying "thanks for experimenting" for inserting blatantly defamatory content isn't the right message at all. Just my two cents. Waitak 06:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
editI just wanted to thank you for so diligently reverting my user page during I.P. 64.230.16.82's recent vandalism spree. I'm not sure how you picked up on it before I did, but again: thanks very much. This guy (or gal I suppose--who knows, right?) really seems to have it in for me, but hopefully by the time his block expires he'll have moved on to other things. What a loser. Buck Mulligan 17:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Given your comment at RFCU, I took it upon myself to do that. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 07:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Could you please kindly provide the diff's where this IP addressed vandalized William S. Burroughs? The only edits I see by this IP address on that article are these:
- [[1]] where I noticed that there was a problem with a section header & I immediately fixed it without looking at what was showing in the paragraph below
- [[2]] -where I find that the reason the section header was messed up was because a previous editor (user:162.127.217.184) had vandalized the page, so to remove the vandalism I reverted to the the latest edit before the vandalism, which was an edit by User:Canticle.
Please explain how my reverting vandalism can be classified as performing the vandalism myself, and provoked a Third level warning where no previous vandalism warnings appear associated with this IP? -- 63.224.137.164 23:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware that according to Wikipedia:Deletion policy, there are many reasons other than notability why an article may be deleted. No one claimed the subject of this article wasn't notable. -- NORTH talk 21:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Xeltopius did not heed your last warning
editI just reverted his vandalism on stupid. Grika 02:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Greatly appreciated, thank you. Abeg92contribs 12:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
You are still listed on the Admin coaching request page
editYour name is still listed at Requests for an admin coach. If you are no longer looking for a coach, or you currently have one, please remove yourself from that list.
The instructions for getting or receiving a coach have changed. It's now a self-help process: just look for a coach from the list of coaches, and contact one. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.
Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Mixed Up
editYou wrote to me: "Sorry for the warning. I got mixed up."
No problem dude;)
Welcome!
Hello, Abeg92/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Tone 21:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
You don't appear to be blocked, if you can't edit can you copy paste the block message here and we'll take a look. Thanks! -- Tawker 02:03, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm O.K. now, thanks! Abeg92 02:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
my rather alarimg user is duck whiff, and i am a niob. i was just saying that what i added to 'muslim' was not nonsense, but respect to muhammed (pbuh) (peace be upon him). plz help me edit pages properly.
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks
editHey dude thanks for reverting the Medfield MA article, the idiot over there was screwing with it... and you fixed it in like seconds. amazing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zork (talk • contribs) 17:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
2000 edits!
editCongratulations on over 2000 edits! -- Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 18:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Usurpation
editfagmo WjBscribe 13:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, I think I just caught AIDS Every Me Every You ← Smbarnzy [3]. The requested username in fact had two recent edits, see [4]. My comments at WP:CHU/U don't make clear that the edits occured to a previous request before the present one was made (I don't think its necessary to do so) but please take care... WjBscribe 06:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
editAwww it feels so good to know that people take notice of ones work around here. Thanks! futurebird 02:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Totally sorry
editSorry for my mistaken AIV report on you... I thought I was reporting an anon IP and got you. Sorry again! KatalavenoTC 02:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
edit- Thanks for the support position. However, I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns. I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor. Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Editor assistance userbox
editAs you're a participant in Wikipedia:Editor assistance, I thought you might be interested in this new userbox that I've designed for the project. You can add it to your userpage with {{User Editor Assistance}}. Walton Vivat Regina! 17:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Can you adopt me?
editHello !! can you adopt me and help me around ? Vinch 09:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for adopting me...now what ??? Vinch 02:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have a question for ya !. How do you create the content box (top of the page) Vinch 14:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Help!
editHi Abeg, I'm writing because the vandal who was messing with my user page a month ago is at it again, this time under a user name rather than an IP address: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ABuck_Mulligan&diff=120100008&oldid=116308480. Anything you can do to help? Like locking my page? Buck Mulligan 02:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, so I can't do that. (Even though you mistook me for one... :-) But. I'll ask one, and see what I can do. Abeg92contribs 09:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi again Abeg, Thanks for taking the time to respond to me. I got an admin by the name of Banno to help me out with my user-page vandalism problem, and my page has been semi-protected. I appreciate you leaving a message on the vandal's talk page, by the way. Have a great day! Buck Mulligan 15:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
RfA
editThank you for the support vote in my recent RfA. Although it wasn't successful I appreciate your vote of confidence. Anyway, I'm continuing on with editing Pacific War-related articles and hopefully you'll see several of them on the FA nominations page in the future. Cla68 23:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
editThank you for your support on my Request for adminship, which finished successfully, with unanimous support of 40/0/0.
I will do my best to serve Wikipedia and the community. Again thanks. | |
---|---|
--Meno25 08:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
Archive_1, thanks for your support in my successful RfA. As the picture shows, the goddesses have already bestowed my new weapons, |
The green "e"
editNow that Esperanza's been deleted, why do you still have a green "e" in your signature? Just curious, that's all. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 03:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Happy first edit day
editPaloma Walker 04:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Newbee Mikemoral 23:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
KFP's RfA thanks
editAdopt Me
editI'm new to wikipedia, can you adopt me?---Blakjak664 {{image=Laptop 01.svg|height=35px|width=35px}} 12:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
TeckWiz's RFA
editHey Abeg92. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. (You may not want to read the end of my sig :) )--TeckWiz is now R ParlateContribs@(Lets go Yankees!) 21:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
"Hokies" in your signature
editHi there! I noticed that "Hokies" (short form for Virginia Tech Hokies) is in your signature. If you do go to Virginia Tech, I would like to give you my condolences. Our prayers go out to you all. If you do not go to Virginia Tech, well...please tell me.
I noticed that you adopted a user. I need some advice: I adopted Tedejomadrid this month. I'm quite concerned about what's going on, because he hasn't been contributing lately. Should I be worried?--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK... :) Thanks for clearing that up!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
why did you delete that?
editi used correct grammar and everything, why did you delete it? you are prejudiced against my headon sexual preference. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HEADONIZHOT (talk • contribs) 18:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
- Sorry, but your nontraditional preference is not appropriate material for an encyclopedia article. Abeg92We are all Hokies! 18:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorted
editJust for the record there is a "wikitable sortable" class, as used to good effect in List of Australian Test batsmen who have scored over 5000 Test runs! --Steve (Stephen) talk 04:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
adoption
editHey I'm Zebomb can you adopt me?--Zebomb 21:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)