Wikipedia

User talk:AbhiMukh97/Archive 2

< User talk:AbhiMukh97
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nick Moyes in topic Teahouse
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Pending changes reviewer granted

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Trolleybuses in Athens

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, O.SY (Athens busses and trolleybusses company) serves Athens Metropolitan Area, but trolleybusses network is only in urban area, there is no trolleybus outside of urban area to the Metro area--2A02:587:441D:63DB:1092:C563:4809:AB6C (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

No More IPv6 Editing

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I revert back because I don't like all IPv6 to edit any articles, I consider better to block all IPv6 worldwide indefinitely. 110.159.7.39 (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

As far as Wikipedia is concerned, they are not bad faith edits and are mostly constructive. Please don't revert, otherwise your editing privileges may be lost. AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 08:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

yo dont mess with my edits, im fine. you on the other hand are being evil

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

you know very well that i was adding proper information

there was no data concerning their plastic surgeries so i added it

how can you be so conniving to remove the info, and then lie saying some fucking bullshit about how "YOU ASSUME ITS VANDALISM" the fuck? you know its not. i know you know its not. so what does that make you? just a liar? an asshole what?

mind your own fucking business and if you have nothing nice to say, then dont say anything

you are bad person. you are shameful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.186.80 (talk • contribs)

Learn to sign your posts first. And don't attack others, learn manners before everything. AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 08:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Why Revert Digital television in Malaysia

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

ASO (Analogue Switch Off) will be delayed again. That is why I change the switch off date. You look at what happened to 19 August 2019, delayed again and again. 110.159.7.39 (talk) 12:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Rushmore University update

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good Day. I received your comment and want to provide you with an update. Some of the information about Accreditation is outdated and does not properly reflect the University in its current status.

Just want you to know it is a constructive edit and not a form of vandalism. Hope all is well. Thanks and take care and please let me know if you need anything else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.91.106.138 (talk) 22:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Section blanking is considered vandalism unless you provide valid reasons or better substitute. And the accreditation is historic, not outdated. Please refrain from blanking that section, I will really appreciate that. AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 02:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

DUDE

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

U R A RE-TA-RD

U R EVIL

NOTHING YOU DO MATTERS

IF I AM CORRECT AND DO THINGS CORRECTLY, AND YOU F-UCK IT UP, THAT EVIL FA-GGOTRY IS ON YOU, NOT ME

PRETENDING LIKE YOU ARENT DOING THAT CHANGES NOTHING


TYPICAL RE-TAR-DED ARAB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.186.80 (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Removal of a page

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi I wanted to talk about the removal of a page and content which was not vandalism. Regards (543654765activenow) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 543654765activenow (talk • contribs) 08:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 12:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Path slopu Thank you, I'm really happy to have it. Cheers, AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 13:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Minato

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

About his draft, I think the writing needs a lot of clean up not in terms of grammar but writing it from a neutral point of view. Avoid any word that could qualified as biased and instead write Wikipedia as if it were a formal letter. For example "Interestingly enough" does not work out in an encyclopedia so that needs further rewrite while short forms like "haven't" should be rewritten as "have not". Avoid capital letter like "Other Media" because that is not the title of a series. In what that draft needs further coverage are the movies The Lost Tower and Road to Ninja where Minato plays a major role in the story and thus reviews of it could lead further exploration of the character's reception. Hope this helps.Tintor2 (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Draft:Minato Namikaze you included material from a Fandom webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism Academy Graduation

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  CVU Academy Graduate
On behalf of the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy, congratulations! You have successfully completed all assignments and have now graduated from the Academy. You completed your final exam with a score of 95% – well done!
It's been a pleasure to work with you over the past month.  I hope you gained something from this CVUA program. Do drop by my talk page you have any questions as I am here to help. Best of luck, and thank you so much for your willingness to help Wikipedia in this role. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: thanks for providing me the best quality training program, that one could ask for. It’s been an honour, training under you. Thanking you, AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 14:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hi AbhiMukh97. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Case

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi AbhiMukh97

I see that you have raised a sock puppet case that accuses my account as being owned by JackAustin87, this is not the case. I know Jack in real life and I decided to become and editor here after he told me about it, mainly to increase my writing portfolio. It would be nice if you could at least take the time to leave me a message before making your accusations. It's very discouraging as a new user to be faced with this and now I am wondering why I should even bother to continue contributing. Change my mind. SimonPenil (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

SimonPenil Sorry to see that you feel discouraged. Wikipedia is for everyone to edit, and you can contribute without having any problem in Wikipedia. But what you're doing in Wikipedia doesn't seem like a contribution to me especially your actions in AFC. You said that you're a new user and It needs a bit of experience to review AFC tasks, it's better for you to learn the basics of Wikipedia before doing such things. I hope you got what I'm saying about. And for your information, closely connected users may be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes if they edit with the same objectives. So, make sure that you run into trouble for this. Happy editing. AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 07:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Unreliable source

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

MeForum.org is not a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources 46.212.241.21 (talk) 03:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Stop Vandalising Edits Which are Correct

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Stop vandalising pages by editing already-correct edits.

Also, since you don't seem to understand the meaning of obsolete as well as extinct (to an extent):

Definition of obsolete: "no longer produced or used; out of date.";

Definition of extinct: "(of a species, family, or other larger group) having no living members.".

So, what does this mean? Obsolete is better in reference to language and extinct is correct for the people, ergo language = obsolete and people = extinct. By your logic (and the other mods), literally everything in the world can become extinct and that certain sentences such as "obsolete model" are "incorrect" and "should be "extinct model" instead". Come off it, the proof is in the Old Prussian Language history page as well as my user page. Do I really have to repeat myself time and time again? Because all I am doing is changing it to its correct terminology... Why do you not know that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.119.133 (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #383

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Tool of the week
    • Namescript fills in labels, descriptions and aliases of items about names, making it easier to create such items (you only need to provide a few statements).
  • Development
    • Wikidata Bridge: add an edit tag parameter when saving (phab:T227003)
    • Adapt buttons' texts to UI language (phab:T228259)
    • More work on setting up the technical background to work on tainted references
    • More work on reducing the resources needed to load pages
    • Create a dependency graph of existing RessourceLoader modules (phab:T232728)

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter
 
 

Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019.

June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585.

Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent.

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

How to creat wikipedia web site

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hello i am glad to see you,it is my first time to start wikipedia site so i need first to know how to creat web site link and to get any information about web sites that i could get to enhance my kowledeg Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fessehaabraham3 (talk • contribs) 12:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Fessehaabraham3 Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, you can create articles about notable subjects here. Before creating an article, you should check the notability guidelines. I suggest you to create an article through the Help page and go create aticle through the article wizard AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 12:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Rishabh K. Shah

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello AbhiMukh97. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Rishabh K. Shah, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: drafts are not eligible for A7 deletion. Thank you. SoWhy 12:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

bro

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

bro why delete my page lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pooky1233 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

@Pooky1233: Your page was a blatant misuse of Wikipedia as web host. However, if you think you have good reasons to get it back; contact the deleting admin Fastily. Thank you, AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 03:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 15

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Newsletter • September 2019

A final update, for now:


The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.

Regards,

-— Isarra ༆ 19:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #384

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Tool of the week
    • This Recent changes tool allows to get a list of unpatrolled Wikidata changes with enhanced filters that are more adapted to Wikidata than the standard Recent Changes page. Available actions include mass patroling and easier revert interface.
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • The state library of Berlin is using Wikidata to display a map of pictures from their architecture journals: Berlin um 1900 - eine fotografische Zeitreise
    • Edit summaries coming from the wbeditentity API (for example from the mobile termbox) will be improved from October 2nd (announcement, ticket)
    • You can nominate your favourite Wikidata and Wikibase projects for the WikidataCon Award until October 7th
  • Development
    • More work done on removing some resource loader modules in order to speed up the load of pages
    • Wikidata Bridge: add an edit tag parameter when saving (phab:T227003)
    • Adapt buttons' texts to UI language (phab:T228259)
    • research regarding permissions/protection (phab:T231209)
    • More preparation work for improving references

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.


kKarl Drais

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello, I thought it was constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.171.136.53 (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Dear AbhiMukh97, thank you for volunteering as a host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users get a hold of the ropes here at Wikipedia, and helping experienced users that just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AbhiMukh97/Archive_2&oldid=1045514075"