Always cite reliable sources

edit

  Thank you for contributing to the article List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Worldbruce: But I see in this article[1] also uses the same source. Abhiseka Nareswara (talk) 09:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pindad SS2 cites several sources that are not reliable. I've removed military-today.com, but don't have time to fix all the others. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 388#Military-Today.com for a discussion of why military-today.com shouldn't be cited.
When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username and the time you posted the comment. If you don't sign in the same edit that you add a {{ping}}, the ping won't work - the recipient won't receive any notificiation. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pindad PM3

edit
 

The article Pindad PM3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recreation of deleted article without sourcing showing notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  12:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply