Abir Babu
Welcome!
edit
|
October 2017
editI suggest you read wp:talk page guidelines. Removal of other's valid talk is not acceptable.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Male genital mutilation, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
BTW: Your wp:edit summary on Talk:Male genital mutilation of Reverting flawed comments by Flyer22 Reborn is bordering on a personal attack. I would suggest you be more careful on your phrasing. See wp:NPA Jim1138 (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- In general, even a comment you don't agree with or consider a personal attack should not be deleted from a talk page. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
You need to know the Wiki policies first before sending disruptive threats on another user's talk page. Here's the Wiki policy for removal of contents those constitute a personal attack and aren't constructive for the article: Wikipedia:No personal attacks#Removal of personal attacks Such contents should not only be removed, the user made such comments can be charged for disruptive edits.
Abir Babu (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- I did not send any disruptive threats, see WP:AGF, I simply advised against removing anything other that the most blatant personal attacks (eg. "You idiot"), I do have concerns about the user who was accusing you of being a sock as well. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
editHi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thiscrund68, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Nihlus 01:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Thiscrund68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l lists.wikimedia.org. Mz7 (talk) 03:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC) |