Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederic Wehrey (3) (October 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Abirfarid, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederic Wehrey (2) (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chess was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 14:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Frederic Wehrey (3)

edit

Draft:Frederic Wehrey (3), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frederic Wehrey (3) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Frederic Wehrey (3) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Frederic Wehrey (2)

edit

Draft:Frederic Wehrey (2), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frederic Wehrey (2) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Frederic Wehrey (2) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:US-academic-administrator-stub

edit

Abirfarid, I have no idea why you added a draft submission onto the above template, but I have reverted the edit (it was severely impacting the function of Wikipedia). IF you want to create a draft, I would suggest using the Article Wizard. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, the IRC channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederic Wehrey (December 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 02:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederic Wehrey (January 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit