You neither requested an edit, nor is the page fully protected. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 23:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 23:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi (October 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Abrarkhanjoy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Note

edit

Hi. We all get upset when another editor is trying to destroy our work, but please stay calm and do not overreact, as you did here [1] and there [2] [3]. If the subject of your article is notable, the article will easily survive the WP:AFD discussion. Do not attack other editors. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You don't own articles

edit

Please don't post messages to article talk pages instructing other editors not to edit the articles. You do not own Wikipedia articles, and do not have the right to determine who may edit them. JBW (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Neutral point of view

edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Need for care over edit summaries

edit

With this edit you gave an edit summary saying that you were adding references, but in fact you weren't. Please be careful to make sure your edit summaries accurately reflect what your editing is doing. JBW (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent unacceptable editing. While some of the unacceptable edits you have made could conceivably have been made in good faith but mistakenly, some of them certainly weren't, such as moving another editor's user page in what looked like a revenge attack, hijacking an article and attempting to turn it into a promotional page on a completely different subject, and, most recently, removing an editor's comment from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BD2412 T 20:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply