Achaney123

1/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article 1/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content 1/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper 0/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal) Comments and Suggestions for Improvement: Unfortunately it appears that your citations didn't show up correctly on Wikipedia. In one spot your citation seemed to cause an issue and gave the fallowing error message "Cite error: A set of ". The only other thing I would say is that you may want to make the explanation of the methodology of your study a bit shorter. It was well done over all, and with the fixing of the citations I think it will really improve the Wikipedia page. Bruce Dangerfield (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)