User talk:AdamComer/Archive 1

Your draft article, Draft:Jérémie Covillault

Hello, AdamComer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jérémie Covillault".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 13:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, that’s fine I didn’t realise it was still there to be honest. Feel free to remove, thanks for flagging this up. AdamComer

 Resolved

Ways to improve Jérémie Covillault

Hi, I'm Boleyn. AdamComer, thanks for creating Jérémie Covillault!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Whoops, sorry about that, this was meant to be a draft until I proofed and cited sources. AdamComer (talk) 08:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

 Resolved

A page you started (Renaud Roussel) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Renaud Roussel, AdamComer!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please work on this in draftspace and move back when it has references. Thanks for your work on this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

As with the above this was meant to go to drafts first, I mistakenly moved it to the main space. Sources have now been added. AdamComer (talk) 08:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

 Resolved

Block Review, July 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 07:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I would alsol ike to ask you to not add content that is copyrighted elsewhere.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Read and understood. I will not add copyrighted content to the site. -AdamComer (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)}}

You were asked to substantially reword your request, you have not done so. It's likely you will need to go by the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AdamComer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don’t really know how better to word my request. I feel I have touched upon all the points raised above and added a comment regarding copyrighted content. I will post again: “Hi, I am requesting removal of my block. As mentioned on my previous request I have now seen the error of my ways and would like to prove that I have learnt from them. First of all I’d like to acknowledge the reasoning for my block, I created a page that self promoted a band I was once in which is a complete conflict of interest, I originally was ignorant to rules regarding this and thought it was okay, however I completely understand my position now and intend to make it right. I want to assure the Wikipedia administrators that unblocking my account would not cause any future disruption to the service. Once my block is lifted I will immediatly remove the contraband page currently on my sandbox and will only make further edits that contribute to the encyclopedia. I have already found some F1 related pages, of which I take a huge interest in, and I’d like to contribute some missing information. I personally feel I have a duty to redeem myself. Once more I really would like to apologise for the events that led to my block, and to the users who’s time I’ve wasted, and hope that I may be granted a second chance to help contribute to Wikipedia.” Please can this block be reviewed. I really dont understand what I’m not saying here to convice the administrators I mean no further harm. AdamComer (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I don't think the standard offer is necessary - although no-one responded to this request previously, that's not XxDalekcaanxx's fault. This seems to me to provide good reasons for unblocking so - on the understanding that you will make no further edits on the subject of B Yellow or its members - I'm lifting the block per WP:ROPE. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Yunshui, thank you for agreeing to unblock me. I agree to the terms of this unblock and will not contribute on that subject any longer. I’m going through a house move at the moment so am pretty busy right now, but when I’ve settled in about a month I will make a start on helpful contributions. AdamComer 11:22 14 July 2018 (UTC