Recent edits to B-boying

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, B-boying, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Red Bull BC One World Finals Italy 2015

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Red Bull BC One World Finals Italy 2015, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.circleindustry.at/red-bull-bc-one-world-finals-2015/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Urban Dance & Educational Foundation

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Urban Dance & Educational Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444Talk 07:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Page move

edit

Notability

edit

Hi there, if you're going to create articles at Wikipedia, you must make sure that you are properly establishing notability and creating articles that serve the community by being observant of community standards. You have created a number of articles both at this account and as Ademiricedillos, apparently either unaware of the general notability guideline or more specific notability criteria for events. Most of the articles you've created seem to rely on blogs and primary sources instead of establishing notability through mainstream news sources. I very strongly urge you to read the general notability guideline and the event criteria and quickly establish the subjects' notability, otherwise you're almost certainly going to see your work deleted by the community. Also note that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I don't know that the heavy emphasis on competition trees is in keeping with community norms, but you should definitely research that. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply