Adiagr
Welcome!
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
BARNStars
edit
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| Thank you for contributing to Invading the Sacred DharmoRakshati (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC) |
Asian religions, modernisation, and the primacy of "experience"
editHi Adiagr. You may be interested in reading these publications:
- De Michelis, Elizabeth (2005), A History of Modern Yoga, Continuum
- Sharf, Robert H. (1995-B), "Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience" (PDF), NUMEN, vol.42 (1995)
{{citation}}: Check date values in:|year=(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Sharf, Robert H. (2000), The Rhetoric of Experience and the Study of Religion. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 267-87 (PDF)
I know it's not the approach you prefer, but hey, knowing your "enemies" helps in opposing them. By the way, wouldn't it be better to remove that barnstar? It was rewarded by a sock. Not really a recommendation... Joshua Jonathan Let's talk! 14:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Since you posted on my page, one unsolicited advice from my side, although I know that it is not your preferred way. Hinduism and its traditions have to be lived and understood and not merely read, that too from translated / misunderstood works. Taste of the pudding is in eating it and not merely reading cookery books. So visit a Vedic Ashram with an open mind and experience yourself.
As Kabir said: No one has understood the Truth by merely studying volumes. One who has understood the meaning of two and a half letters of love (Prem in Hindi), is the real Pandit.
You can never understand why in this land of India, various sects and religions lived peacefully since ages. You are focussed on religion & dogma and do not understand that Dharma is not religion.
Hinduism cannot be studied by conventional means that you have adopted. You have to come out of your comfort zone and armchair academic pursuit and make attempts to actually understand the process by undergoing Saadhna (Not in AC rooms, but in Aashrams), and not merely reading about it. But then that is the difficult route. Adiagr (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
edit
Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Joshua Jonathan#Avestan that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please refrain from comments like these. If ypu want to use Wikipedia for xenophobe comments and personal attacks, you're at the wrong place. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know, Adiagr, what kind of fire you were trying to stoke--but please don't stoke it anymore. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Business of Freedom
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Business of Freedom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Your article
editI have read the article, and I found it promotional and deleted it. Advertising and promotion are not only found where there are profits involved - have you never seen adverts for charities and religious organisations? Wikipedia does not allow advertising or promotion WP:SPAM. I would point out to you our policy on notability WP:GNG which is essential reading before creating an article. Without notability by our definition an article will not survive. Also essential reading is WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. Please note that Amazon and Goodreads reviews are not considered reliable independent sources, and nor are any reviews in publicly editable places or blogs. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory or free web space. Peridon (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Peridon (talk) Hello, I would like to retrieve the page and improve upon the content. Can you help. Adiagr (talk) 04:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- If I put it into your user space, a patroller would tag it again. I advise a rewrite after you've found the necessary reliable independent sources, and can show that the book is notable enough for an article. I'll ask @MelanieN: to have a look at it. Peridon (talk) 15:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, Peridon, but I'm not going to have time for this kind of thing for at least a week. Crisis at work taking up all my time. Maybe Ritchie could help? --MelanieN (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've a quick look at Business of Freedom, but I think Peridon was right to delete it as there doesn't seem to be anything salvageable from it from first glance - sorry. We could move it to draft and submit it via the Articles for creation process, but I think we'd end up in the same situation. As it's a book, and DGG has already proposed speedy deletion, I would probably go with his opinion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- FWIW, not held in any US library except Library of Congress. Not that this is definitive proof of non-notability for a Indian book. DGG ( talk ) 17:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, Peridon, but I'm not going to have time for this kind of thing for at least a week. Crisis at work taking up all my time. Maybe Ritchie could help? --MelanieN (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Business of Freedom
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Business of Freedom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Reply
editHi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
- it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the book, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its publisher. You gave no references at all.
- You gave no indication as why the book meets the notability criteria, such as sales figures, book chart placing or awards
- The text appears to be an extended personal review rather than a factual, referenced encyclopaedia article. We do do not accept original research of any kind, let alone opinion pieces.
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
- Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: This book is also the culmination of a very interesting experiment... an innovative experiment that can help create new business models of publishing...“In short, the talent of the period opted for 'Business of Freedom' rather than 'Business of Profit'”... The book makes a strong case for India to have its own management thought syllabus and not to blindly apply the conclusion from another society and tying to a situation. pure spam, and that's just from the introduction
- Promotional quotes from the author and the foreword writer are clearly not neutral
- referring to the author as "Mr" is unusual, and something usually associated with an employer
- If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it, particularly is you are being recompensed directly on indirectly for writing your review.
- How is the article that you have deleted different from Blue_Ocean_Strategy or Stay_Hungry_Stay_Foolish or other Management books?— Other stuff exists; whatever the faults of other articles, it's yours that is currently being judged against our criteria.
Note that the article was nominated for deletion twice by admin DGG and previously deleted by admin Peridon, so you are a long, long way from writing an acceptable encyclopaedia article rather than a personal review Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Reminder of ARBIPA-notification
editYou already received an ARBIPA-notification in july 2015, but maybe you need a reminder? Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Userpage and talkpage
editDo ypu know the difference between a userpage and a talkpage? Messages are to be posted at talkpages, not at userpages, as you did here. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Academic papers
editI have some academic papers you and @HemaChandra88: may be interested in. Set up email and email me.VictoriaGraysonTalk 18:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM
editIt's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history
editYou are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Indian defence services
editYou are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
editGreetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
editIn 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
- (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
- (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
- Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
- Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Project Tiger Writing Contest
editIn 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
- Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
- List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
- Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
- For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
WikiProject India
edit
Namaste, Adiagr. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Hinduism
edit
Hello, Adiagr. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
edit|
|
Hello Adiagr. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}
Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC) |
You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.
editHi Adiagr! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |