Adrianbius

May 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Why are you obsessed with trannys/chicks with dicks? Seems wierd to me, but whatever dude!

I am merely observing that your edits to these pages, whatever the reason you chose to read and edit them, are highly inappropriate. You're probably going to get blocked soon if you continue these behaviors. DMacks (talk) 06:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh. It seemed you were into trannys perhaps

POV See Also Links

Please stop adding "See Also" links at Chaz Bono that do not apply to the subject of the article, as per WP:SEEALSO. Dayewalker (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring at Chaz Bono

See WP:AN3#User:Adrianbius reported by User:Native94080 (Result: ). If you continue, you will most likely be blocked for vandalism. EdJohnston (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Just so you know, the page has been protected, partially because of you. And I want to emphasize the importance of neutrality and avoiding grossly insulting sneers about subjects, especially living persons, in edit summaries, such as you used in this edit. (Notice that I had to redact the edit summary because of its nature.) Please show some tact. -- tariqabjotu 01:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of thirty-six hours for violation of biographies of living persons, insults, provocation, etc., at Chaz Bono. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. -- tariqabjotu 01:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

On second thought, after looking through the body of your edits, you so far have been solely involved in provocation at the article. Therefore, I'm blocking you instead. -- tariqabjotu 01:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)